Connect with us

World

Vladimir Putin's plan? A report explains Macron's movement of NATO soldiers in Ukraine

Published

on

Vladimir Putin's plan?  A report explains Macron's movement of NATO soldiers in Ukraine
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

According to a report, French President Emmanuel Macron is considering sending NATO soldiers to Ukraine to prevent the possible arrest of Vladimir Putin.

PARIS – What are you up to, you imperialist in the Kremlin? The brutal ruler from Moscow who waged the Ukrainian war with hundreds of thousands of soldiers attacked the neighboring Western country that had just turned into the European Union.

Ukraine War: Paris may fear a major Russian attack on Odessa

In other words: What attack is the warmonger from Russia planning next? This is the question politicians are asking themselves between Ukraine, Paris and Washington, while Chancellor Olaf Scholz (Social Democratic Party) in Berlin continues his cautious policy in the bloody conflict. The French president has shown himself and his position more aggressively and loudly in recent weeks.

Why? Like the always informed Italian daily newspaper La Repubblica Paris now reportedly appears to fear a major Russian attack from Crimea on the Ukrainian port city of Odessa. In order to enable Putin's regime to use the city of over a million people as a bargaining chip to impose a hypocritical and one-sided ceasefire with Kiev.

What is he up to? Moscow Governor Vladimir Putin. © Imago/SNA

Odessa a target for Vladimir Putin? The Ukrainians attack Crimea from here

According to the report, Macron links his concerns to the new wave of mobilization in the Russian Federation, through which Putin appears to want to recruit up to 150,000 additional soldiers for military service (or force them to do so). The aforementioned number can be interpreted as an indication of the next Russian attack in the summer of 2024, after analysis La Repubblicabased in and adjacent to Rome Corriere della Sera It is considered one of the leading media outlets in Italy.

READ  Andrea Kewell: ZDF presenter settles scores with the "Tagesschau" editorial team.

Macron described the city of Odessa as the target of a potential major attack by Putin because the Kremlin wants to create a Black Sea corridor to Moldova's breakaway and Moscow-friendly Transnistria, thus denying Kiev access to the sea. Which, for example, would severely restrict the very important agricultural export sector. And that's not all: it is clear that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have deployed their coastal batteries equipped with „Neptune” anti-ship missiles in the Odessa region, which are inflicting heavy losses on Russian forces in Crimea.

Odessa
location: In southern Ukraine on the Black Sea near the border with Moldova
resident: 1.01 million
characteristics: The most important coastal city and the third largest city in Ukraine in terms of population
Military importance of the region: Base for coastal batteries with Neptune anti-ship missiles; Base for Majora surface drones

EU sources fear that Vladimir Putin wants to divide Europeans over policy towards Ukraine

Majora surface drones, which are feared by the Russian Black Sea Fleet, are also launched from the coast of the Odessa region. La Repubblica He quotes an unnamed EU source from Brussels about the Odessa scenario: “At this stage, the discussion about sending soldiers to support Ukraine will no longer be theoretical, but will become very concrete. We Europeans will face the risk of division.”

Depending on the outcome of the attack in the south, the Russian autocrat could play the unilateral ceasefire card, the Italian newspaper's analysis continues. Another EU source was quoted as saying: “We must be careful not to be naive if we are faced with a technical ceasefire that will be nothing but a bluff by Moscow.” Worryingly: EU political forces that want to stop arms shipments to the Ukrainians will have another argument to use with the “ceasefire illusion.”

READ  Consequences of Russia's losses in the Ukraine war
Do you speak the same language in Ukrainian politics?  French President Emmanuel Macron (left) and Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD).
Do you speak the same language in Ukrainian politics? French President Emmanuel Macron (left) and Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD). © IMAGO / Political Moments

Moscow and Paris: A dispute over a telephone conversation between Russia and France

At the beginning of April, it became clear that Macron wanted to push German Chancellor Schulz to take a tougher course on Ukraine. How is that Wall Street Journal As reported on Wednesday (April 3), the French president wanted to keep Putin's Kremlin regime in the dark about the West's future „red lines” and therefore proposed a similar change in strategy to US President Joe Biden and German Prime Minister Scholz. The American magazine wrote that the goal was an ambiguous stance towards Russia.

Macron caused an international uproar at the end of last February when he no longer wanted to rule out the possibility of deploying NATO ground forces in Ukraine in the future. After the first phone conversation between Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and his French counterpart Sébastien Lecornu since October 2022, France clearly rejected a communication from Russia regarding the alleged content on Thursday (April 4). According to the Kremlin's version, France expressed its readiness for possible peace negotiations. It was said from Paris: “This is not true.” At no time have we shown any willingness to engage in dialogue on Ukraine or negotiations or anything like that. (evening)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

“It will put us in trouble”: Pistorius warns against issuing an arrest warrant against Netanyahu

Published

on

“It will put us in trouble”: Pistorius warns against issuing an arrest warrant against Netanyahu

„It will put us in trouble”
Pistorius warns of issuing an arrest warrant against Netanyahu

Listen to the material

This audio version was created artificially. More information | Send your opinion

It remains uncertain whether the ICC will actually issue an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Defense Minister Pistorius shows little understanding of the prosecutor’s request. Hague’s actions put the federal government in a bind.

Federal Defense Minister Boris Pistorius criticized the request of International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan to issue arrest warrants against Israeli government leaders. Meanwhile, Khan also applied for arrest warrants against the Hamas leadership. „To be honest, I don’t really understand that these two disparate issues are being collected in one file,” the Social Democratic Party politician said during a visit to Lithuania.

Pistorius continued: “This is a decision that we must respect. However, I do not think its impact is appropriate.” On Monday, Khan applied for arrest warrants on charges of crimes against humanity against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Galant. Arrest warrants were also requested against the leader of the Islamic terrorist organization Hamas in the Gaza Strip, his deputy, and the Hamas Foreign Minister.

Meanwhile, Pistorius stressed: “Until now we have been talking about applying for arrest warrants and not issuing them.” Therefore, he refrains from speculating on how the federal government will react and deal with it. “I think it is clear that this will put us in a real dilemma,” the minister said.

A painstaking initiative of Patriots for Ukraine

Pistorius earlier visited Latvia and called on other allies to provide Ukraine with anti-aircraft systems. “All our partners who can provide Patriot or similar systems must do so as quickly as possible, because this is crucial for the further development of the war and, in particular, for the country’s morale, security and infrastructure,” the Social Democratic Party politician said. .

In light of new Russian attacks on the city of Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelensky recently asked the international community to provide two Patriot anti-aircraft systems to protect residents living there. Ukraine has been defending itself against a Russian war of aggression for two years and relies largely on Western support for military equipment.

Germany had previously launched an initiative to quickly deliver air defense systems to Ukraine. Attempts to purchase Patriot missiles from partner countries in Europe or abroad have so far been fruitless. “Germany has provided Ukraine with 25 percent of our Patriot capabilities – more than any other country in the world,” Pistorius said. Asked why other countries were hesitant about this, Pistorius said: “I have no idea.”

READ  American media reported an Israeli attack in Iran
Continue Reading

World

The judge in Trump’s trial ripped his collar

Published

on

The judge in Trump’s trial ripped his collar

The judge in the illicit funds trial against former US President Donald Trump, on Monday Meanwhile, the New York courtroom must be evacuated. Previously, lawyer Robert Costello, who was called to stand alongside the defence, repeatedly expressed his opinion Disagreement was expressed with the decisions made by Judge Juan Merchan.

Each time Merchan agreed with the prosecutor’s objection, Costello – who was counsel for the prosecution’s key witness Michael Cohen – shook his head. He shook his head or sighed theatrically. Costello responded to another objection supported by Merchan An audible “Jeez!” (In German something like „Du meine Gute!”).

Merchan then escorted the jury out of the room and told the Trump ally on the witness stand: “I want to be in my own courtroom.” Talk about proper decencyHe refuses to comment on his decisions. „Your presence Don’t give me a sideways glance or roll your eyes„, dictated Merchan, who has a reputation for not putting up with anything. When Costello continued to frown and look at the judge with a red face, Merchan said in an audibly annoyed voice. „Are you staring at me?

Recommended editorial content

Here you will find external content selected by our editors, enriching the article with additional information. Here you can view or hide external content with one click.

I agree that external content can be viewed to me. This means that personal data may be transferred to external platforms. You can find more information about this in Data Protection Settings. You can find them at the bottom of our page in the footer, so you can manage your settings or revoke them at any time.

READ  Attack on Odessa - "Targeted Russian Terror"

Journalists who had been covering the first criminal trial against a former US president for weeks were reluctant to comply. “The public has a right to know,” one reporter shouted. Armed officersJournalists, who were guarding the court, were then asked to leave the hall, but it appears that Trump supporters were allowed to remain.

When Merchan allowed the public and returned to the courtroom, The mood seemed less colorful. However, Costello continued to criticize him.

After the meeting, Trump spoke of an „incredible display” and called Merchan a „tyrant.”

In this case, Trump was accused of using forged business documents to cover up payments to former porn actress Stormy Daniels, thus secretly interfering in the presidential election. The former porn actress was through pay He was tricked into keeping quiet about an alleged sexual relationshipWhich, by her account, she was with the real estate mogul in 2006.

Trump denies any sexual contact with the woman. Cohen moved on $130,000 (about €120,000 in today’s money) to Stormy Daniels. According to the indictment, he later recovered the money from Trump while he was already president. Cohen’s refunds were therefore falsely declared as legal fees.

READ  Tornado in the United States: at least 26 dead after a storm in Mississippi

Trump’s defense lawyers do not dispute the hush money issue, but they deny that their client was privy to its payment.

Trump describes the New York trial as well as the three other criminal charges against him as… Politically motivated maneuvers to prevent his return to the White House. The 77-year-old right-wing populist wants to run for the presidential elections next November against current President Joe Biden, against whom he was defeated in the 2020 elections. (AFP)

Continue Reading

World

Gaza War: Biden describes the request to issue an arrest warrant against Netanyahu as “outrageous”

Published

on

Gaza War: Biden describes the request to issue an arrest warrant against Netanyahu as “outrageous”

US President Joe Biden He rejected accusations against the Israeli leadership of committing genocide against the Palestinians in its fight against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

“Contrary to the allegations of the International Court of Justice against Israel, this is not genocide,” Biden said on Monday (local time) in the Rose Garden of the White House during a celebration of the achievements of American Jews in the United States. “We reject that. We stand with Israel.” The US government expressed. The request to issue an arrest warrant against the Israeli leadership is “outrageous.”

South Africa has repeatedly called on the International Court of Justice to take action against Israel, accusing it of committing genocide. UN judges took emergency resolutions demanding that Israel do everything in its power to prevent genocide and allow humanitarian aid.

Joe Biden speaks in the Rose Garden of the White House on Jewish American Heritage Month

Source: AFP/Almond Ngan

The ICC prosecutor on Monday also requested an arrest warrant for crimes against humanity against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Galant. Arrest warrants were also issued against the leader of the Islamic Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip, Juhya Al-Sinwar, and other representatives of the Hamas movement.

Biden reiterated that the US government rejects the actions of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. The American President said: There is no equality between Israel and Hamas.

Read also

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Biden also indirectly addressed the issue of the detention of an American ammunition shipment due to Israel’s actions in the city of Rafah in the Gaza Strip, saying: „Let me be clear: I will always ensure that Israel has everything it needs to protect itself to defend against it.” Hamas and all other enemies.”

READ  An attack outside a synagogue in Tunisia left many dead

Biden also stressed that “my commitment to the security of the Jewish people and the security of Israel and its right to exist as an independent Jewish state is unwavering.” The US government continues to call for a two-state solution that is safe and lasting and brings peace.

Netanyahu calls the accusations “ridiculous”

He expressed his opinion in a similar statement US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken Monday. The fact that arrest warrants have been requested for high-ranking Israeli officials alongside arrest warrants for Hamas terrorists is “shameful.” Blinken said: “We reject the public prosecutor’s link between Israel and Hamas.” He added, „Hamas is a brutal terrorist organization that committed the worst massacre against Jews since the Holocaust and is still holding dozens of innocent people hostage, including Americans.”

Blinken also made clear that the US government believes the court, which is not recognized by the United States, has no jurisdiction in the case. The US Secretary of State stressed that although Israel is not a member of the International Criminal Court, it is ready to cooperate with the prosecution. But “troubling procedural issues” called into question the legitimacy and credibility of the investigation. Blinken also stated that the Attorney General’s actions could jeopardize ongoing efforts to reach a ceasefire agreement.

Read also

Chancellor Schultz and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu

Arrest warrant against Netanyahu

Karim Khan, Prosecutor of the International Criminal CourtHe had previously requested the issuance of arrest warrants against Netanyahu, Galant, and Hamas leaders Jiya Sinwar, Muhammad Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh. He said on Monday that he believes they are all responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip and Israel in connection with the Gaza war that has been ongoing for more than seven months.

Israel strongly criticized these requests. Head of government Netanyahu He called it ridiculous and accused the prosecution of anti-Semitism. He said: “As the Prime Minister of Israel, I reject with disgust the prosecutor in The Hague’s comparison between democratic Israel and the mass murder committed by Hamas.” “No pressure or decision in any international forum will prevent us from meeting those who want to destroy us.” Netanyahu stressed that Israel will continue the war against Hamas.

READ  Andrea Kewell: ZDF presenter settles scores with the "Tagesschau" editorial team.

Foreign Minister Israel Katz On Monday, he spoke of the “scandalous decision.” This represents a „direct and unrestrained attack on the victims of October 7 and our 128 hostages in Gaza.” “While Hamas murderers and rapists commit crimes against humanity against our brothers and sisters, the prosecutor mentions our crimes at the same time.” Katz said, according to what was reported from his office: “The minister and the Minister of Defense next to the vile Nazi monsters of Hamas – a historical shame that will remain in the memory forever.”

He ordered the immediate establishment of a follow-up center in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where specialists would fight the decision, whose main goal was to “tie the hands of the State of Israel and deprive it of the right to self-defense.” He wanted to talk to the foreign ministers of the major countries so that they could object to the Attorney General’s decision „and declare that even in the case of arrest warrants, they will not implement them against the leaders of the State of Israel.”

Read also

The Iranian president dies in a helicopter crash

Israeli President Isaac Herzog rejected the request, calling it “more than just outrageous.” Herzog said that any attempt to compare Hamas terrorists with Israel’s democratically elected government cannot be accepted. Herzog said: “We will not forget who started this war and who raped, slaughtered, burned, mistreated and kidnapped innocent citizens and families,” referring to the Gaza war. He added: „We expect all leaders of the free world to firmly condemn and reject this move.”

READ  Hebe and Sani: Police find two bodies | News

„A crime of historical proportions”

Benny GantzThe former army chief and current member of the war cabinet strongly criticized Khan’s announcement, saying Israel operates with „one of the strictest ethical rules” and has a strong judiciary capable of investigating itself. After the massacre committed by Hamas, Israel is fighting „one of the just wars in modern history.” “The prosecutor’s position in seeking arrest warrants is in itself a crime of historic proportions that will be remembered for generations to come,” Gantz said.

The opposition in Israel also condemned the proposal. Opposition leader Jair Lapid spoke of a „complete moral failure.” “We cannot accept the outrageous comparison between Netanyahu and Sinwar, between the leaders of Israel and the leaders of Hamas,” the former prime minister wrote on the X website.

Here you will find content from third parties

In order to view the embedded content, it is necessary to obtain your revocable consent to the transfer and processing of personal data, as the providers of the embedded content require this consent as third-party service providers. [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to „On”, you agree to this (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Article 49(1)(a) of the GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can revoke your consent at any time using the key and privacy at the bottom of the page.

Opposition politician Merav Michaeli He described Khan’s decision as „a scandal that the State of Israel cannot and will not accept.” The Israeli leadership „cannot be placed in the same category as a vicious and cruel terrorist organization.” Meanwhile, the leader of the Social Democratic Action Party said that Israel has reached a dangerous and unprecedented level under Netanyahu’s leadership. She added: „It is dangerous for Israeli national security, and for ensuring the existence of the State of Israel.” She demanded: “Netanyahu’s destructive farce must end immediately.”

For its part, Hamas criticized the Public Prosecutor’s request to issue arrest warrants against its leaders. A statement broadcast by the Hamas movement’s Al-Aqsa satellite channel said, „His decision compares the victim to an executioner and encourages the occupation to continue its war of genocide.” The terrorist organization criticized the fact that only two arrest warrants were requested against Israeli politicians.

Continue Reading

Trending