Connect with us

World

Historic defeat for McCarthy in the US House of Representatives – Politics

Published

on

Historic defeat for McCarthy in the US House of Representatives – Politics

Historic defeat in Washington: Republican Kevin McCarthy failed to be elected Speaker of the US House of Representatives on his first attempt. The second and third attempts also failed. In the end the meeting was adjourned. The last time, a hundred years ago, that a vote for a powerful office required more than one ballot paper, and a parliamentary group refused to support its candidate in the first round.

The election of the President is the first major act of the newly elected House of Representatives. And until the presidency is clarified, nothing works: the House of Representatives cannot begin its work, not even new deputies can be sworn in. McCarthy received only 203 out of 434 votes in the first round – he would have needed 218. 19 of his party colleagues refused to vote for him.

The second round of voting started immediately after the first. This again demonstrated the internal turmoil of the Republican faction. Representative Jim Jordan re-nominated McCarthy and urged his fellow party members to close ranks. One of McCarthy’s staunchest opponents, Rep. Matt Gaetz, in turn nominated Jordan and asserted that it might be best to pick someone who did not want the position so badly. In McCarthy’s short nomination speech, Jordan did indeed show more visions of the future than he had ever heard from him. Then Jordan received 19 votes, and finally 20 in the third round.

One Republican rebel is Chip Roy of Texas. He told CNN he was voting against McCarthy because the House „should work differently.” Therefore, Roy is disturbed by the fact that votes on expenses are often linked together. For example, he would have liked to vote separately on US aid to Ukraine, but this was tied to a major balancing act.

READ  Israel has only "a few weeks" left in the war against Hamas

Republicans had taken control of the chamber in the election — in the Senate, Democrats under President Joe Biden still hold a slim majority. The position of Speaker of the House, which Democrat Nancy Pelosi has held in recent years, ranks third in the US national ranking after the president and vice president.

The record number is 133 ballots

Several of his party colleagues rebelled against McCarthy in the run-up to the vote and declared before the vote that they would not support him. Given the narrow majority, it has been suggested that McCarthy might miss the necessary majority on the first ballot.

McCarthy was belligerent just before the session, saying, „I hold the record for the longest speech in plenary.” He has no problem setting a record for most votes in the House of Representatives vote. The record is 133 votes and dates from 1856.

Each ballot is long because all MPs are called individually to name their preferred candidate. Even if McCarthy eventually prevailed, he would emerge weak from the struggle and would have some trouble marshalling a majority on the floor of Congress for years to come.

After weeks of debates with his opponents behind closed doors, visibly upset, McCarthy went on the offensive before the first ballot and publicly attacked his critics. McCarthy said they are all about personal advancement, not country.

Long attempts at reconciliation

The 57-year-old has been trying for a long time in internal negotiations with all sorts of concessions to change the opinions of his critics. McCarthy revealed that he was told on Monday that he would only get the necessary votes if he provided certain members of the group with certain offices and budgets. McCarthy said that one of his opponents, Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz, said bluntly that he did not care if the Democratic nominee won the election.

READ  Republican Jorge Santos is also a particularly busy hustler

He lamented that his critics did not care about America, but only themselves. „I will always fight to put the American people first – not a few individuals trying to get their way.” So there may be a „battle” in the plenary of the chamber, but it’s about the whole group and the country, „and that’s fine with me,” he said.

Behind the McCarthy feud, there are fundamental disagreements among Republicans about the path and leadership in the future. The party is torn between right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump and the party’s more moderate members. This is especially true of the faction in the House of Representatives.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?

Published

on

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?
[–>

Der Beginn des Europawahlkampfs der österreichischen Grünen ist von Turbulenzen um Spitzenkandidatin Lena Schilling überlagert worden. Am Mittwoch erschien in der österreichischen Zeitung „Der Standard“ ein Bericht, in dem Schilling zwar keine rechtlichen – oder im engeren Sinne politischen – Vorwürfe gemacht werden, aber in dem ein äußerst ungünstiges Charakterbild gezeichnet wird.

[–>

Die Grünen sahen sich veranlasst, am Mittwoch kurzfristig eine Pressekonferenz einzuberufen, auf der sich die Parteispitze mit markigen Worten hinter ihre Europa-Spitzenkandidatin stellt. Der Grünen-Vorsitzende und Vizekanzler Werner Kogler sprach von einem „anonymen Gemurkse“ und „Gefurze“, durch das man sich nicht beeindrucken lassen werde.

[–>

Anlass der Berichterstattung ist eine gerichtliche Unterlassungserklärung, mit der sich Schilling verpflichtet, bestimmte Behauptungen über Personen aus ihrem privaten Umfeld nicht mehr zu verbreiten. Daran anknüpfend zitiert die Zeitung mehrere anonyme Gesprächspartner in einer Weise, die es nahelegt, dass die junge politische Quereinsteigerin – bekanntgeworden als Klimaaktivistin – häufiger falsche abträgliche Behauptungen über andere Personen in die Welt setze. Schilling mochte sich in der Sache nicht äußern, da es sich um ihr Privatleben handle. Es werde gegen sie mit Gerüchten und Unterstellungen „kampagnisiert“.

[–>[–>

Zeitung kritisiert Reaktion des Parteivorsitzenden

[–>

Die Chefredaktion des linksliberalen Blattes rügte ihrerseits, dass der Grünen-Vorsitzende journalistische Arbeit als „Gefurze“ bezeichne. Man könne jede behauptete Einzelheit belegen. Veröffentlicht wurde – bei geschwärzten Namen – die Unterlassungserklärung. In dem Artikel wird ausführlich begründet, warum man sich entschlossen habe, in dieser Weise über Dinge zu berichten, die die Privatsphäre berühren. Schilling sei Spitzenkandidatin, werde wahrscheinlich ins Europaparlament einziehen und könnte dort die österreichische Grünen-Delegation anführen. Daher sei sie eine Person öffentlichen Interesses, und es sei relevant, wie sie sich gegenüber Kollegen und auch Medien verhalte.

READ  The Sudanese army is ready to extend the cease-fire

[–>

In einem Fall geht es darum, dass sie einem Journalisten sexuelle Belästigung vorgeworfen haben soll. Der Mann sei von einer Kündigung bedroht gewesen, doch habe eine Untersuchung durch seinen Arbeitgeber keine Hinweise darauf ergeben, dass an dem Vorwurf etwas dran sei.

[–>[–>

Die Grünen sprachen hingegen von einer „organisierten Kampagne“. Die Fraktionsvorsitzende Sigrid Maurer meinte, das sei auch direkt gegen junge Frauen gerichtet. Klimaschutzministerin Leonore Gewessler bezeichnete die Vorwürfe als „hemmungslos“. Schilling selbst äußerte, dass sie lieber über politische Inhalte diskutieren wolle, nämlich den Klimaschutz.

Continue Reading

World

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense? Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power

Published

on

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense?  Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

The Crimean Bridge is a symbol of power for Putin – and a tempting target for Ukraine. But a Ukrainian intelligence expert recommends a different strategy in the war.

Kiev – The Russian regime warned of a „devastating retaliatory strike” if Ukraine attacks the Russian-annexed Crimea peninsula or the Crimean bridgehead again. The reason: There is speculation in Russia that Ukraine may be planning a major attack – on the occasion of “Victory Day,” which Russia marks on May 9 with an exhibition of captured military equipment. A simultaneous attack on the bridge connecting the peninsula to mainland Russia, It would be humiliating Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This was announced by a Ukrainian military intelligence officer in the British newspaper in April Watchman To: “We will destroy the bridge in the first half of 2024” The destruction of the bridge, which has already been attacked twice, is “inevitable.”

Now a Ukrainian intelligence expert is explicitly warning against destroying the Crimean Bridge. This is not out of fear of Putin’s revenge, but because he considers this a waste of Ukraine’s already scarce military resources.

A tempting war target: the Crimean Bridge has been attacked repeatedly – ​​as happened here in October 2022. © Uncredited/AP/dpa

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” Warning against wrong tactics in the Ukraine war

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” asks Ivan Stupak, a former employee of the Ukrainian Internal Intelligence Service. Interview with Ukrainian News Agency Union. Destroying the Crimean Bridge will be complex and difficult. The bridge was repeatedly damaged in previous attacks, but has since been restored. „It’s not doing well.”

READ  The Sudanese army is ready to extend the cease-fire

Stupak believes that future attempts to destroy the bridge would be a waste of energy. Especially since Russia has now responded: it is clear that Putin’s army is no longer using the bridge for military purposes.

A Ukrainian open source agency recently found using satellite images that far fewer trains pass through the Kerch Bridge than in the past. Instead, Russia is now increasingly using land routes into the annexed areas of eastern Ukraine to supply the front lines of the Ukrainian war.

The head of Ukrainian domestic intelligence, Wasyl Malik, said in March 2024 that Russia would no longer use the Crimean bridge to deliver weapons. Trains that passed the bridge now transport only people and consumer goods.

The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war.
The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war. © Konstantin Mihalchevsky/Imago

In the war against Russia, Ukraine should attack other targets instead of the Crimean bridgehead

Ukrainian military expert Stupak recommends in an interview with Union Therefore, no more missiles and ammunition are wasted on attacks on the Kerch Bridge. Instead, the Ukrainian military should attack Russian targets whose destruction would be of greater benefit. Stupak cites „headquarters and depots” as examples, as well as air defense complexes, aircraft and airfields.

For example, if Ukraine destroyed a Russian S300 anti-aircraft missile complex, this would directly help Ukrainian defense: Russia could then immediately shoot down fewer Ukrainian planes and drop fewer missiles on soldiers, “meaning we don’t lose.” Any military or military forces.” Civilians. This is a great added value. This is also a direct effect.” Because they meant to “destroy Putin’s money.”

Experts recommend launching attacks on Russian fighter planes instead of the Crimean bridge

The Ukrainian expert said that the most important thing for Ukrainian defense in the war against Russia is the destruction of Russian fighter planes carrying high-explosive glide bombs. As a result of Russia’s use of so-called FAB bombs, the Ukrainian city of Avdiivka fell, which could now be repeated in the currently besieged city of Chasiv Yar.

The military expert warns that FAF glide bombs will penetrate Ukrainian defenses “like can launchers.” Therefore, Ukraine must destroy Russian combat aircraft directly where they are stationed or when they approach Ukraine. Stupak said that would be a „great advantage and opportunity to stop the Russian advance,” unlike the elaborate attacks on the Crimean bridge.

The latter, Stupak sees, are primarily PR campaigns “for Facebook”: “There will then be likes, memes and reposts for two days,” “But what will it bring us and how will it affect the situation at the front?” Decisive. (SMU)

Continue Reading

World

Trump’s trial in the documents case has been postponed indefinitely

Published

on

Trump’s trial in the documents case has been postponed indefinitely

As of: May 8, 2024 at 7:28 AM

While things are getting more uncomfortable for former US President Trump in court in New York, he is having success in Miami: Proceedings there in the documents case probably won’t begin before the election in November.

The trial of former US President Donald Trump in the case of seizure of secret state documents was supposed to begin on May 20. But as the Florida judge in charge announced in a letter, the start of the proceedings will be postponed. Elaine Cannon explained that this was due to the open legal questions due to the large number of applications. No new date has been set.

For special prosecutor Jack Smith, the decision is a setback. The process is unlikely to begin before the presidential election in November, in which Trump is expected to run again as the Republican Party’s nominee.

Secret documents kept in a private villa

The 77-year-old was charged federally in the documents case last year. In this case, he is accused of illegally storing highly sensitive information from his presidency. In August 2022, FBI federal police searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and seized several sets of documents classified as top secret that he had not turned over to the National Archives as required. It is said to have included military plans and information about nuclear weapons.

Trump is also accused of trying to destroy evidence in the case. On the most serious charges, he faces up to ten years in prison.

READ  The United States is preparing for Putin's nuclear strike in Ukraine

Trump pleaded not guilty at the impeachment hearing that took place in Miami last year. His lawyers are still trying to avoid the proceedings. Among other things, they rely on Trump’s immunity as president. They say keeping the documents as personal records was an official act of the president.

Does the judge delay the proceedings?

Judge Cannon, who is in charge of the documents process, was appointed by Trump. Critics accuse it of prolonging the process and processing requests in slow motion. As justification for delaying the start of the trial, Cannon wrote that setting a trial date at this point would be “unwise.” There are a lot of open legal questions that still need to be clarified. It will take proper preparation and time to fully and fairly address this issue in order to present this case to a jury.

A total of four cases are against Trump

For Republicans, the decision is considered a success. He is currently facing charges in a New York court in connection with secret payments to a porn actress. That’s why he regularly spends long hours in the courtroom.

In total, Trump is currently facing four criminal proceedings: In addition to the trial in the documents case and the secret money case in New York, there is also an election fraud trial at the federal level and another in the US state of Georgia.

Continue Reading

Trending