In The Hague, Zelensky demands that Putin be brought to the International Criminal Court. To do this, the greatest war criminal of the century must be defeated on the battlefield first. Maybret Elner is concerned: “Big attack, big doubts — she has Ukraine adequate support? „
guests
Jurgen Tritten (68, Grenz). „We are heading for a long war of attrition!” warned the foreign policy expert Elner four weeks ago.
Jan Asselborn (68). Luxembourg’s foreign minister sees no willingness to negotiate with Putin.
Ben Hodges (65). The retired lieutenant general, the newest commander of US forces in Europe, hopes: “It may happen before the end of summer that Crimea will become unbearable. But everything depends on the West supplying Ukrainians with long-range weapons.
Janka Oertel (39). „Meanwhile, we here in Europe also realize more and more that we can no longer think of our security in isolation from security in East Asia,” warns the political scientist.
Katrin Eugendorf (60). ZDF war correspondent grows anxious at the front: „The danger situation has grown greatly!”
Elmar Tevesen (55). The ZDF studio director in Washington warns of Putin’s methods of „disinformation, propaganda, lies and constant change of heart”.
two 68ers and four pros. Zoff-o-meter hopes for facts rather than propaganda!
The most important assessment of the situation
The American general said: „The biggest problem is that my boss, as well as the German chancellor and the British prime minister, have always refrained from saying clearly: we want Ukraine to win.”
As a result, Hodges continues: “The fact that they have not specified this strategic outcome means that we are only presenting things step by step and also making excuses that we cannot deliver F-16s or long-range missiles. The result should of course be that Ukraine wins!”
gravest mistake
„There is always a lot of frustration in Ukraine about the indecisive behavior of American„, according to ZDF correspondent Eigendorf. „But the Ukrainians know very well that the United States and Europe are their most important allies.”
ZDF colleague Theveßen from Washington comments: „There have always been situations in recent months where you have the feeling that the government in Kyiv doesn’t control everything.” „One has the feeling that Zelensky doesn’t know what every part of his army or secret services is doing.” Oof!
Asselborn, celebrated by the talk show host as „Mr. Europe,” raises a finger: „Europe has trained a few thousand soldiers and supplied us with tanks, and now we’ve withheld 2.5 billion taxpayers’ money for ammunition,” he praises.
His analysis: The core of this Putin regime is war. If Putin loses the war, he’s gone. I think the Ukrainians are now trying to get to the Black Sea. And when they are there, they have completely different options when it comes to Crimea.
Most degrees of professional conduct
„The Americans are providing information, ammunition and everything on a very large scale,” Trettin said. „The United States, Germany and Europe are closed in a way that they would not have imagined five or six years ago.”
Jurgen Tritten
Photo: ZDF/Jule Roehr
“It’s a difficult balancing act for China,” says expert Oertel, who presents itself as supporting peace but ultimately sides firmly with Moscow. Balancing this is not easy for the Chinese leadership! „
The most complete analysis
“China has two interests that are difficult to reconcile,” Trittin helps, engaging the statesman both visually and verbally. “They are interested in a cheap gas station in Russia,” and they don’t want to “disrupt certain supply chains. This makes them act in a dazzling swing manner.”
Strongest objection
Asselborn claims that „China, along with Brazil and India, last week voted in favor of a resolution at the United Nations saying that aggression must be condemned, that is, Russian aggression in Ukraine. This is the first time!”
Trittin nods meaningfully, but expert Janka Oertel quickly takes the air pump away from the Luxemburger: „It wasn’t conviction!” „It was not a decision about Ukraine!” It was just cheery generalizations. groan!
The main illustration
Ortel explained that it is about „also a long-term technological cooperation” between Russia and China. “And about a lot of things we can’t prove. Who is actually handing over to whom? Where does something go through the dark channels?”
The expert specifies that „what China supplies, for example, is body armor or semiconductors,” „all goods that do not directly serve the course of war as military goods, but certainly help keep the war machine running.”
The verdict of the American general on the alleged Ukrainian drone attack on Putin: “A poorly executed attempt by the Kremlin to portray Russia as a victim! It is a sign of how bad things are.”
Retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges (65)
Photo: ZDF/Jule Roehr
His suspicions are directed primarily at the leader of the notorious „Wagner” mercenaries: „Maybe it was an inside job because there are people, like Prigozhin, who want to humiliate others. It is really surprising that there is so much discord in the Russian leadership!”
Most strategic analysis
Washington does not currently supply long-range missiles and combat aircraft, but it is not excluded either, ”Thivesen emphasizes. “Many Ukrainian pilots have been trained on F-16 simulators in Texas. You must now present what will bring decisive profits to Ukraine as soon as possible! „
Ukrainian attacks, for example on tank farms to disrupt Russian logistics, are „a really good way” for the American general, because: „This is how you can defeat the masses with precision.” If you hit certain targets, you can „neutralize” the Russians’ superiority in men and material.
The most legitimate question
Hodges asks, „Why do we still allow the Russians to have their own limits?” They are firing missiles at civilian buildings. They are killing innocent civilians in Ukraine. But we condemn Kiev if a drone is launched on an oil depot. Boom!
Most dramatic warnings
“The willingness to make sacrifices is decreasing,” Eugendorf notes on behalf of Ukraine. People want to go back. Ukraine at its limits! „
Asselborn comes back from staying for a full two minutes, but then gets to the point: „If Putin wins, it’s Poland!”
The most accurate picture of the situation
“I think the aim of the Ukrainian offensive was to isolate Crimea,” Hodges imagines, “to penetrate the Russian defenses in the Sea of Azov and get long-range precision weapons there to make Crimea unacceptable to Russian forces.”
His main remark: „The Black Sea Fleet has already begun to withdraw.” In this way, Ukraine „could be able to liberate Crimea by the end of this summer.” This would „change everything”. Then the Donbass in the east comes later.
As soon as Crimea falls, the general believes, „there will not be much enthusiasm in the Kremlin for the desire to keep the poorest provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk.” Crimea is critical „because Ukraine cannot be safe as long as Russian forces are there.”
„Crimea is like a dagger stuck in the stomach of Ukraine,” Hodges explains. And we know that big investors will not participate in rebuilding Ukraine if they think that Russia might attack again.
darkest prophecy
„If we now buy ourselves peace and quiet to make false concessions,” Eigendorf warns, „then we will have in practice the conditions of the Middle East there.” “A situation must be created in which Russia stops attacking Ukraine, otherwise there will be an open conflict that will continue.”
And the ZDF correspondent believes that „peace is also possible with Putin”, but first „Russia must be pushed so far into the military corner.”
The most optimistic forecast
„The Russian army was almost blown to pieces,” the general concludes. Their defense industry was also destroyed. I think there will be a reckoning now as people decide they haven’t benefited from these centuries of imperialism.”
last stand
„What should never happen again is a cease-fire that is only an excuse to continue waging a hybrid war,” Trittin explains. „This is the point where you have to have strong security guarantees so that Ukraine can defend itself and rebuild.” Amen!
But for the ZDF correspondent, something else is needed: „It’s about how to enable Putin to find a way that doesn’t question his judgment,” she says at the end. miss out! This sounds like Putin’s two notions of Sahra and Genknecht.
Quote from the evening
„I think the Russians see their nuclear weapons as useful only when they are not using them,” Ben Hodges
Conclusion
Six presidents, one opinion, different arguments, lively debate, cringe-worthy insights The talk show host has guided herself through slips of the tongue and tapeworm questions with lavishly affectionate fingers.
It was a war talk show in the „extreme situation” category.
Trump fans are using the upside-down American flag to cast doubt on Biden’s election victory. It can also be seen in front of the judge’s house.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Conservative Justice Samuel Alito of the U.S. Supreme Court is in trouble. After Donald Trump’s election defeat in 2020, an upside-down American flag was apparently hung in front of his house – a popular symbol among Trump supporters to cast doubt on US President Joe Biden’s election victory.
Report from The New York Times According to the report, the flag was raised in front of Alito’s home in Alexandria, Virginia, on January 17, 2021. The newspaper wrote this, citing statements and photos from the judge’s neighbors. However, the accused denies having anything to do with the matter. “I was in no way involved in raising the flag,” Alito said in an emailed statement to the newspaper. Instead, according to the judge, his wife raised the upside-down flag. But not just „in response to a neighbor’s use of offensive and personally insulting language on yard signs.”
A pro-Trump symbol in front of the judge’s house? Allegations against Supreme Court judges
The matter is explosive because the upside-down American flag was a symbol of Trump supporters who falsely claimed in the wake of the recent election that President Biden stole the office. During the storming of the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021, the upside-down flag was also raised several times by rioters. Biden’s inauguration was just three days away at this point. Just eleven days later, a Trump supporter’s slogan flew over the lawn of a top federal judge.
In this context, it is the duty of such an official to ensure that no misunderstandings occur, as do legal and ethicists. The New York Times He confirmed the opposite. Even the appearance of bias should be avoided, otherwise the impartiality of the judge may be called into question. The mere impression of a political opinion can be a problem. “It could be his wife or someone else living in his house, but it shouldn’t be in his yard as a message to the world,” law professor Amanda Frost said in the report.
Wife in neighborhood dispute – Commitment to Donald Trump despite being a judge?
Raising that license plate, Frost continued, „is the equivalent of putting up a 'Stop the Steal’ sign in the yard.” This slogan – in German „Stop the steal” – was the slogan of those people who stormed the Capitol for their former president. According to the legal expert, the matter becomes a problem at the latest when it comes to the property of the judge who decides “cases related to the elections.” While the flag was raised, the court was still grappling with the question of whether allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 US election should be investigated. Alito argued in favor of hearing the arguments, but was ultimately on the losing side.
In fact, according to the article, interviews with residents revealed that the justice’s wife, Martha Ann Alito, had gotten into a fight with another family in the neighborhood over an anti-Trump sign on their lawn. However, given the timing and strong meaning of the symbol, the upside-down flag could have been interpreted by neighbors primarily as a political statement by the couple.
Political labels taboo on Supreme Court: Is Trump’s judge unfit for office?
The Code of Ethics applicable to lower courts in the United States, as well as the Code of Ethics recently adopted by the Supreme Court, emphasize the need for judges to remain independent. Political statements or opinions on matters that may be brought before them should be avoided. Court officials are not permitted to publicly express their partisan political opinions. This also includes attaching signs or vehicle stickers.
For Take Back the Court, a group that opposes the conservative path the court has taken in recent years, this is evidence that Alito does not belong on the court. “Sam Alito has disqualified himself from legitimately serving on the Supreme Court,” Sarah Lipton Lubit, the group’s president, said, according to the website. HuffPost In the current situation. Perhaps there is nothing like raising the middle finger to the American people than “proudly displaying, in your front yard, the remains of a failed coup attempt against the country you were supposed to serve.” (Tn)
NATO is one a report According to the New York Times (NYT), it appears close to sending troops to Ukraine. These forces aim to train Ukrainian soldiers. According to the American newspaper, this step would drag the United States and Europe deeper into the conflict.
There is a shortage of soldiers in the Ukrainian army, and there appears to be no end in sight to the war. Russia invades the lands. The question is how long Ukraine can survive in the face of a union with about 3.5 times the population.
That’s why Ukrainian officials have reportedly asked the United States and NATO members to bring 150,000 new recruits to the front line to make them operational more quickly — and some Ukrainian forces are now scheduled to be trained in Germany, among other places.
Good morning, Berlin the news
Thank you for registering. You will receive a confirmation via email.
The White House had previously repeatedly confirmed that it would not deploy American forces, including trainers, on Ukrainian territory. This is a position that was repeated by a government official on Thursday. The newspaper wrote that in this case, America could be drawn into a deeper war.
America is against sending troops: but for how long?
The US government called on NATO allies not to send their forces. As part of NATO, the United States would be bound by NATO treaty to help defend against any attack on the trainers.
The New York Times wrote that the United States has not yet agreed to this. However, Gen. Charles Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, claimed on Thursday that NATO’s deployment of trainers seemed inevitable. “We will get there with time,” he added.
The idea of sending troops to Ukraine has been around for a long time. In Europe, French President Emmanuel Macron in particular has called for Europe to be more directly involved in the war in Ukraine. Just this week, the Estonian government also did not rule out sending troops to western Ukraine.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky: Is NATO now sending troops?Bestemage/Imago
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis supported Emmanuel Macron’s position in one of the positions interview With the Guardian last week. “Our forces have already received training before the war in Ukraine,” he said, adding: “So it may be possible to return to this tradition.”
US forces have already trained Ukrainian forces in Poland, Germany and the United States. The United States had previously supported a NATO training program at Gavoriv in western Ukraine, but American forces withdrew from there early in the war.
“US officials now realize that current training by Ukrainian forces is inadequate, and that they need better and faster training to confront the expected Russian attack this summer,” the New York Times wrote.
Training courses abroad were not always successful, the Times wrote, citing as an example training on German soil in maneuver warfare, mine-clearing and other military tasks. However, it is said that such extensive training was rather difficult over a period of twelve weeks.
Ukrainian forces are scheduled to be trained in Germany
Now, large groups of new Ukrainian recruits could be sent to Germany and Poland for training purposes, the New York Times wrote, citing anonymous officials. Accordingly, the troops should be sent to the US Army training facilities in Grafenwoehr (Bavaria). There they will be taught „combined arms warfare.”
The troops will then be sent approximately 1,600 kilometers to Lviv and then to Kiev to reach the front lines. She added that Germany, Britain and France are currently working to locate defense companies in Ukraine to help build and repair weapons systems near the combat zone.
HIt doesn’t look good in war when a country’s defense minister gives his prime minister an ultimatum. “I call on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to make a decision,” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Galant said in a press conference on Wednesday.
He added that Netanyahu must “announce that Israel will not take civilian control of the Gaza Strip, that Israel will not establish a military government in the Gaza Strip, and that an alternative administration to the Hamas administration in the Gaza Strip will be formed immediately.” Gallant, Netanyahu belongs to the Likud Party.
Galant said that „the day after Hamas” can only be achieved if Palestinian bodies take control of Gaza, accompanied by international actors, in reference to the Palestinian Authority and moderate Arab countries.
Read also
According to the Minister of Defense, he has been urging the Prime Minister for months to present a scenario for the period after the military operation in Gaza. But because of his hesitation, Israel’s military successes are once again at stake: „Hesitation in making a decision ultimately means making a decision.”
Here you will find content from third parties
In order to view embedded content, it is necessary to obtain your revocable consent to the transfer and processing of personal data, as providers of embedded content require this consent as third-party service providers. [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to „On”, you agree to this (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Article 49(1)(a) of the GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can revoke your consent at any time using the key and privacy at the bottom of the page.
Six months after the mass killing of Israelis by the Hamas terrorist militia and the start of the subsequent Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip, the tone between the country’s military leadership and Netanyahu’s government has become noticeably harsher. Gallant’s ultimatum was the strongest expression yet of growing opposition among the generals to the lack of leadership in the Jewish state’s political leadership.
Last weekend, the military leadership had already played a grudge against Netanyahu to the media — with the same tenor: If the prime minister does not soon present a plausible scenario for Israel’s war goals, what Israel has achieved so far risks being destroyed. Lost.
Evidence of the officers’ fears can be found in daily reports from the front. Although Israel announced months ago that it had militarily taken control of the northern Gaza Strip, new clashes with Hamas are still erupting there.
Is it perhaps because a reporter asked military spokesman Daniel Hagari earlier this week that Israel has not created a post-war order in the north? Hajari responded: There is no doubt that the presence of an alternative administration to the Hamas administration would increase the pressure on Hamas. But this is a question directed to the political leadership.”
Source: OpenStreetMap; The world of infographics
In fact, the solution Gallant outlined in his press conference has been around since at least November of last year. At the time, American, Arab and European representatives, as well as members of Israeli security circles, told WELT AM SONNTAG that the Palestinian Authority would take over the administration of the Gaza Strip and an international protection force with the participation of Western-oriented forces. The Arab countries were in the process of preparation.
But Netanyahu still does not want to make any commitment. The Prime Minister continues to say what he does not want. Shortly after Gallant’s press conference, Netanyahu was released Video about SMS service. Netanyahu says, looking annoyed: “I am not ready to replace Fatehistan with Hamastan.”
He refers to the secular Palestinian organization Fatah, the leading force in the Palestinian Authority, which lost power in Gaza to Hamas, but still bears responsibilities in the West Bank.
Israeli soldiers in Gaza in mid-May
Source: Agence France-Presse
The body was established when Israel concluded the Oslo Peace Accords with Fatah leader Yasser Arafat in the early 1990s. Since then, she has been considered the legitimate representative of the Palestinians. “The Palestinian Authority supports terrorism, teaches terrorism, and finances terrorism,” Netanyahu responds to Gallant in the video, even though the Authority generally cooperates with Israel on security issues.
“The basic condition for handing over Gaza to another actor is the destruction of Hamas, without condition or condition.” This is how Netanyahu’s video ends after only 48 seconds, without the Prime Minister explaining who the „other perpetrator” is.
Read also
The fact that Netanyahu avoided making a decision is down to his coalition partners. The majority of his government is very narrow and the Prime Minister relies on the parties of the settler movement and its leaders Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir.
But they are increasingly openly calling for Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip and the alleged voluntary migration of Palestinians from there. Ben Gvir, who holds the position of Minister of Public Security, confirmed this on Wednesday evening. “Tell them: Go home, go to your countries! This is ours now and forever!”
But neither Israel’s allies nor the Israeli people, for whom opinion polls show a clear majority against the reoccupation of the Gaza Strip, support such a plan. The Israeli army had tried unsuccessfully to control the coastal strip for decades until its withdrawal in 2005. The army would not want to undertake such a bloody mission again.
Here you will find content from third parties
In order to view embedded content, it is necessary to obtain your revocable consent to the transfer and processing of personal data, as providers of embedded content require this consent as third-party service providers. [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to „On”, you agree to this (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Article 49(1)(a) of the GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can revoke your consent at any time using the key and privacy at the bottom of the page.
