Connect with us

World

Putin is said to have plans for Kharkiv

Published

on

Putin is said to have plans for Kharkiv
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

Sources in the Kremlin hint at Putin's possible war strategy in Ukraine. Kharkiv can play a decisive role, also in ending the war.

Moscow – The war in Ukraine has been going on for more than two years. Last weekend, the Ukrainian Armed Forces reported one incident Successful attack on ships and infrastructure of the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol. However, Ukraine has recently suffered setbacks on the front. How could the war between the two countries develop?

According to a report issued by Kyiv Post Recent anonymous information from circles close to the Kremlin indicates that Vladimir Putin is considering two possible strategies for continuing the war in Ukraine. From the Independent News Agency Medusa Information gathered from people associated with the Russian government shows that most of Russia's political elite believe Putin will continue the war.

Is Putin preparing for a new major attack against Ukraine?

However, it remains unclear what goals Putin may pursue in the near future. A „faction” within an information source allied with the Kremlin suspects that Putin has identified weaknesses on the front in the wake of Ukraine's recent setbacks, and may be willing to intensify his efforts to achieve a „decisive victory.” This may indicate the capture of the capital, Kiev.

Another faction, also close to Putin's administration, believes the Russian leadership could pursue „more realistic goals.” One such goal may be to seize Ukraine's second-largest city, Kharkiv, in the east of the country.

READ  war | Wagenknecht-Ex plays Russia's 'Advisor of Exile'
Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a visit to his campaign headquarters. (Archive photo) © Alexander Zemlyanichenko/DPA

Sources close to the Kremlin confirm Kharkiv's location is militarily important for further military operations

Putin has repeatedly emphasized the strategic importance of Kharkiv for Russian military strategy. It is believed that the so-called sanitary zone around the Belgorod region near the border could be useful in reducing bombing near the border. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov explained Putin's proposal to the state news agency TASS“The President believes that against the backdrop of drone attacks, and against the backdrop of artillery shelling of our lands, security measures are being taken for some settlements on our lands, especially social institutions and residential buildings.”

However, far-right Russian blogger Igor Skurlatov criticized the plan on Telegram: “What about the health zone that Vladimir Putin talked about a few days ago? We all agreed that the borders of this region would better extend along the western borders of Ukraine. but not. Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov decided that they would continue [die russische Regionalhauptstadt] Belgorod will run. An interesting turn of events. We will never win this way!” Skorlatov expressed concern about the „mass evacuation” on the Russian side, and expressed his sincere hope that this was only a „temporary measure.”

Sources close to Putin believe that another major attack is possible, which would require mobilization

Although Putin's statements do not yet give clear indications of possible hostilities in the future, sources close to the Kremlin believe that another major attack on Kharkiv, the country's second largest city, is possible. Such a scenario would require additional mobilization efforts and further Russian military reinforcements.

Since the beginning of the war between Russia and Ukraine Kharkiv region is one of the main theaters of the war. After a large-scale counterattack in 2022, Ukraine was able to reclaim much of the region. However, the city itself remains a target of Russian air strikes.

This article was written by editor Fabian Hartmann. Editor Bidartin Bulukbasi then used the AI ​​language model to optimize at his own discretion. All information has been carefully checked.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?

Published

on

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?
[–>

Der Beginn des Europawahlkampfs der österreichischen Grünen ist von Turbulenzen um Spitzenkandidatin Lena Schilling überlagert worden. Am Mittwoch erschien in der österreichischen Zeitung „Der Standard“ ein Bericht, in dem Schilling zwar keine rechtlichen – oder im engeren Sinne politischen – Vorwürfe gemacht werden, aber in dem ein äußerst ungünstiges Charakterbild gezeichnet wird.

[–>

Die Grünen sahen sich veranlasst, am Mittwoch kurzfristig eine Pressekonferenz einzuberufen, auf der sich die Parteispitze mit markigen Worten hinter ihre Europa-Spitzenkandidatin stellt. Der Grünen-Vorsitzende und Vizekanzler Werner Kogler sprach von einem „anonymen Gemurkse“ und „Gefurze“, durch das man sich nicht beeindrucken lassen werde.

[–>

Anlass der Berichterstattung ist eine gerichtliche Unterlassungserklärung, mit der sich Schilling verpflichtet, bestimmte Behauptungen über Personen aus ihrem privaten Umfeld nicht mehr zu verbreiten. Daran anknüpfend zitiert die Zeitung mehrere anonyme Gesprächspartner in einer Weise, die es nahelegt, dass die junge politische Quereinsteigerin – bekanntgeworden als Klimaaktivistin – häufiger falsche abträgliche Behauptungen über andere Personen in die Welt setze. Schilling mochte sich in der Sache nicht äußern, da es sich um ihr Privatleben handle. Es werde gegen sie mit Gerüchten und Unterstellungen „kampagnisiert“.

[–>[–>

Zeitung kritisiert Reaktion des Parteivorsitzenden

[–>

Die Chefredaktion des linksliberalen Blattes rügte ihrerseits, dass der Grünen-Vorsitzende journalistische Arbeit als „Gefurze“ bezeichne. Man könne jede behauptete Einzelheit belegen. Veröffentlicht wurde – bei geschwärzten Namen – die Unterlassungserklärung. In dem Artikel wird ausführlich begründet, warum man sich entschlossen habe, in dieser Weise über Dinge zu berichten, die die Privatsphäre berühren. Schilling sei Spitzenkandidatin, werde wahrscheinlich ins Europaparlament einziehen und könnte dort die österreichische Grünen-Delegation anführen. Daher sei sie eine Person öffentlichen Interesses, und es sei relevant, wie sie sich gegenüber Kollegen und auch Medien verhalte.

READ  Heavy fighting until January: The United States is “deeply concerned” about the development of the ground attack on Gaza

[–>

In einem Fall geht es darum, dass sie einem Journalisten sexuelle Belästigung vorgeworfen haben soll. Der Mann sei von einer Kündigung bedroht gewesen, doch habe eine Untersuchung durch seinen Arbeitgeber keine Hinweise darauf ergeben, dass an dem Vorwurf etwas dran sei.

[–>[–>

Die Grünen sprachen hingegen von einer „organisierten Kampagne“. Die Fraktionsvorsitzende Sigrid Maurer meinte, das sei auch direkt gegen junge Frauen gerichtet. Klimaschutzministerin Leonore Gewessler bezeichnete die Vorwürfe als „hemmungslos“. Schilling selbst äußerte, dass sie lieber über politische Inhalte diskutieren wolle, nämlich den Klimaschutz.

Continue Reading

World

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense? Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power

Published

on

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense?  Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

The Crimean Bridge is a symbol of power for Putin – and a tempting target for Ukraine. But a Ukrainian intelligence expert recommends a different strategy in the war.

Kiev – The Russian regime warned of a „devastating retaliatory strike” if Ukraine attacks the Russian-annexed Crimea peninsula or the Crimean bridgehead again. The reason: There is speculation in Russia that Ukraine may be planning a major attack – on the occasion of “Victory Day,” which Russia marks on May 9 with an exhibition of captured military equipment. A simultaneous attack on the bridge connecting the peninsula to mainland Russia, It would be humiliating Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This was announced by a Ukrainian military intelligence officer in the British newspaper in April Watchman To: “We will destroy the bridge in the first half of 2024” The destruction of the bridge, which has already been attacked twice, is “inevitable.”

Now a Ukrainian intelligence expert is explicitly warning against destroying the Crimean Bridge. This is not out of fear of Putin’s revenge, but because he considers this a waste of Ukraine’s already scarce military resources.

A tempting war target: the Crimean Bridge has been attacked repeatedly – ​​as happened here in October 2022. © Uncredited/AP/dpa

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” Warning against wrong tactics in the Ukraine war

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” asks Ivan Stupak, a former employee of the Ukrainian Internal Intelligence Service. Interview with Ukrainian News Agency Union. Destroying the Crimean Bridge will be complex and difficult. The bridge was repeatedly damaged in previous attacks, but has since been restored. „It’s not doing well.”

READ  war | Wagenknecht-Ex plays Russia's 'Advisor of Exile'

Stupak believes that future attempts to destroy the bridge would be a waste of energy. Especially since Russia has now responded: it is clear that Putin’s army is no longer using the bridge for military purposes.

A Ukrainian open source agency recently found using satellite images that far fewer trains pass through the Kerch Bridge than in the past. Instead, Russia is now increasingly using land routes into the annexed areas of eastern Ukraine to supply the front lines of the Ukrainian war.

The head of Ukrainian domestic intelligence, Wasyl Malik, said in March 2024 that Russia would no longer use the Crimean bridge to deliver weapons. Trains that passed the bridge now transport only people and consumer goods.

The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war.
The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war. © Konstantin Mihalchevsky/Imago

In the war against Russia, Ukraine should attack other targets instead of the Crimean bridgehead

Ukrainian military expert Stupak recommends in an interview with Union Therefore, no more missiles and ammunition are wasted on attacks on the Kerch Bridge. Instead, the Ukrainian military should attack Russian targets whose destruction would be of greater benefit. Stupak cites „headquarters and depots” as examples, as well as air defense complexes, aircraft and airfields.

For example, if Ukraine destroyed a Russian S300 anti-aircraft missile complex, this would directly help Ukrainian defense: Russia could then immediately shoot down fewer Ukrainian planes and drop fewer missiles on soldiers, “meaning we don’t lose.” Any military or military forces.” Civilians. This is a great added value. This is also a direct effect.” Because they meant to “destroy Putin’s money.”

Experts recommend launching attacks on Russian fighter planes instead of the Crimean bridge

The Ukrainian expert said that the most important thing for Ukrainian defense in the war against Russia is the destruction of Russian fighter planes carrying high-explosive glide bombs. As a result of Russia’s use of so-called FAB bombs, the Ukrainian city of Avdiivka fell, which could now be repeated in the currently besieged city of Chasiv Yar.

The military expert warns that FAF glide bombs will penetrate Ukrainian defenses “like can launchers.” Therefore, Ukraine must destroy Russian combat aircraft directly where they are stationed or when they approach Ukraine. Stupak said that would be a „great advantage and opportunity to stop the Russian advance,” unlike the elaborate attacks on the Crimean bridge.

The latter, Stupak sees, are primarily PR campaigns “for Facebook”: “There will then be likes, memes and reposts for two days,” “But what will it bring us and how will it affect the situation at the front?” Decisive. (SMU)

Continue Reading

World

Trump’s trial in the documents case has been postponed indefinitely

Published

on

Trump’s trial in the documents case has been postponed indefinitely

As of: May 8, 2024 at 7:28 AM

While things are getting more uncomfortable for former US President Trump in court in New York, he is having success in Miami: Proceedings there in the documents case probably won’t begin before the election in November.

The trial of former US President Donald Trump in the case of seizure of secret state documents was supposed to begin on May 20. But as the Florida judge in charge announced in a letter, the start of the proceedings will be postponed. Elaine Cannon explained that this was due to the open legal questions due to the large number of applications. No new date has been set.

For special prosecutor Jack Smith, the decision is a setback. The process is unlikely to begin before the presidential election in November, in which Trump is expected to run again as the Republican Party’s nominee.

Secret documents kept in a private villa

The 77-year-old was charged federally in the documents case last year. In this case, he is accused of illegally storing highly sensitive information from his presidency. In August 2022, FBI federal police searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and seized several sets of documents classified as top secret that he had not turned over to the National Archives as required. It is said to have included military plans and information about nuclear weapons.

Trump is also accused of trying to destroy evidence in the case. On the most serious charges, he faces up to ten years in prison.

READ  News | Israeli President: There is no war between Jews and Muslims

Trump pleaded not guilty at the impeachment hearing that took place in Miami last year. His lawyers are still trying to avoid the proceedings. Among other things, they rely on Trump’s immunity as president. They say keeping the documents as personal records was an official act of the president.

Does the judge delay the proceedings?

Judge Cannon, who is in charge of the documents process, was appointed by Trump. Critics accuse it of prolonging the process and processing requests in slow motion. As justification for delaying the start of the trial, Cannon wrote that setting a trial date at this point would be “unwise.” There are a lot of open legal questions that still need to be clarified. It will take proper preparation and time to fully and fairly address this issue in order to present this case to a jury.

A total of four cases are against Trump

For Republicans, the decision is considered a success. He is currently facing charges in a New York court in connection with secret payments to a porn actress. That’s why he regularly spends long hours in the courtroom.

In total, Trump is currently facing four criminal proceedings: In addition to the trial in the documents case and the secret money case in New York, there is also an election fraud trial at the federal level and another in the US state of Georgia.

Continue Reading

Trending