Connect with us

World

Putin's reason for the Russian nuclear attack

Published

on

Putin's reason for the Russian nuclear attack
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

Satellite images of Sevastopol. (Archive photo) © HANDOUT / PLANET LABS PBC / AFP

Every missing ship makes Russia more nervous: Sergei Shoigu has now ordered the reinforcement of the Crimean Peninsula – where the use of nuclear weapons has become possible.

SIMFEROPOL – Despite the constant threat, Russian sailors probably had no idea what was heading toward them in the dark of the night. A compilation of videos from Ukrainian intelligence sources suggests that at most a sailor opened fire at the last second. But that no longer makes any sense anyway: No Majora 5 drone Hit the left flank of Tsar Kunikov. Maybe it was a warship from Russia Hit by two drones – the ship sank on February 14 off the coast of Crimea. Another blow from the Ukrainian defenders against Vladimir Putin Black Sea Fleet.

Now Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu has visited Crimea and called for strengthening its defenses Ukrainska Pravda He writes. Shoigu urged his subordinates to „conduct continuous training during the day and night to counter enemy terrorist attacks” and „increase the survivability of ships and the security of infrastructure in the area of ​​state responsibility.” He also ordered the installation of additional firearms, including heavy machine gun systems Attack drones To destroy.

Crimea still has what it takes to become a decisive theater in the Ukrainian war, military economist Marcus Keogh said in an interview with The New York Times Magazine. Daily news “Crimea is not only the logistical center, but also the military strength of the entire Russian operation against them,” he said. UkraineThat is why it will be a major end to the war, perhaps sooner than some expected.” Russian efforts seem to prove this: Washington Post He wants Russian fortifications in images from a satellite service Maxar Their exact location has been determined and now adds up to more than 30 kilometers of trenches in the Crimean peninsula.

READ  Are the protests in France diminishing or are they just beginning?

Ukraine's naval counterattack: gradual destruction of the Russian Black Sea Fleet

According to Russian media, the army has more than 200 facilities spread across the peninsula: air bases, ammunition depots and barracks. Tens of thousands of soldiers are said to be stationed there. The port of Sevastopol is the base of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Everywhere, the invading Russian army appears to have suffered heavy casualties in the Storm of the Century without any enemy action. The strike targeted the patrol boat Tsar Kunikov It was also Ukraine's latest prank against the Russian Navy. Crimea is a raw wound for both sides.

However, the defenders at sea are almost making up for Ukraine's failed counteroffensive on land – with the gradual destruction of Russia's Black Sea Fleet. Online time Verdict: The Ukrainian military said one-third of them were destroyed or damaged. 24 Russian warships and one submarine were disabled. Independent observers gave a slightly lower figure of 20 ships and one submarine. The Crimean Tatars are raising the price of occupying Russia with them Partisan war To almost unreachable heights.

Russia's humiliation of the Crimean Tatars: the motivation behind the rise of Atesh's supporters

Military expert Gustav Gressel, for example, said that by cutting off land routes to Crimea and attacking supply points with long-range weapons, one could try to make Russia's control of Crimea intolerable. ZDF. The conflict in Crimea began in 2014, and it could end there at some point — or it could mean a rude awakening for NATO. The partisan movement “Atysh” (“fire” in the language of the Crimean Tatars), founded in the summer of 2022, may have played a decisive role in Ukrainian successes in Crimea. The forced recruitment of people from Crimea into Moscow's armed forces has provided the nascent resistance movement with a great opportunity to undermine the Russian military from within, writes Elena Beketova of the Center for European Policy Analysis. Russia is now feeling the effects.

READ  Ukraine war: Kyiv and the "Grozny scenario"

Russian President Vladimir Putin is under increasing pressure in Crimea. He wants to save his ambitious goals for the future: to become an international naval power and ruler of the Black Sea. The Black Sea is the interface between the Russian Federation and NATO. This is what the commander of the German frigate, Joran Swistek, wrote to the research center Science and Policy Foundation“Russia has been pursuing its centuries-old interests in the Black Sea by having year-round, ice-free, and if possible, access to vital sea routes around Europe, which supports its claim as a maritime power.” The intelligence of the partisans refutes this claim.

Putin's strengthening of Crimean occupiers by 2025: a warning signal for NATO

Long before the start of the Ukrainian war, the magazine European Security and Defense (ESD) I discussed a research paper that sought to show “how Russia, in violation of international treaties, transformed this once-thriving resort town into a modern military base and even prepared it for the use of nuclear weapons.” The 20-page document emerged as part of the Vienna-based Forum for Security Cooperation (FCS) of the OSCE (Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe).

high Environment and sustainable development In 2020, the Russian Armed Forces in occupied Crimea consisted of 31,500 soldiers, a much larger number than before the occupation of Crimea, which at that time were recruited solely from members of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. the Environment and sustainable development-The source assumed, even without evidence of a military conflict at the time, that the number of Russian forces would increase 1.5 times by 2025 to allow Putin to carry out large-scale military operations in the southwest, at sea and on the coast as well. As in the airspace over the Sea of ​​Azov and the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea. In this regard, the military reinforcements could have signaled an escalation in the annexation of Crimea and could have forced NATO to act quickly.

READ  Chief Wagner Prigoschin now for sure

Moscow's flagship Moskva: former spearhead of nuclear armament in Crimea

Consequently Environment and sustainable developmentDefense correspondent George Mader referred to this early document as evidence that “air and sea means of delivery Putin's nuclear weapons They were transferred to the Crimean Peninsula, while the old infrastructure of Soviet-era camps near Feodosia and Sevastopol is supposed to be renovated” – for example, Bahrov Airport near Kerch. In this context, Mader points out that the Russian Federation has completed Unilaterally the 1997 agreement with Ukraine on the status of the Black Sea Fleet. According to Article 5 of this agreement, the Russian Federation pledged not to acquire nuclear weapons from the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation stationed on the territory of Ukraine. Moscow can still say that Crimea It is no longer part of Ukraine.

However, given the geopolitical situation in Crimea, the potential strengthening of the armed forces with nuclear weapons fundamentally calls into question the multilateral ban on nuclear weapons and puts NATO under pressure to act – and corresponding threats from the Russian side have now been made to the extent Enough. Russia has long deployed various delivery systems and other means by which nuclear weapons can be delivered to Crimea. These included the now sunken cruiser Moskva with the Vulcan missile system, the guided-missile destroyer Smitloy equipped with the Rastrup-B launch system, and the Su-24M bomber unit capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons. Other Russian aircraft that have been stationed in Crimea for some time for training purposes include Tu-22M3 medium-range bombers and Su-34 long-range tactical bombers.

The danger of using nuclear weapons is no coincidence – with the sinking of the Tsar Kunikov the fuse for Russia could have been lit – and Shoigu's angry speech about the porous defense of the Crimean fortifications can be taken as an indicator of this. In fact, experts continue to debate when this might happen Possible use of tactical nuclear weapons via Russia; They also consider Secret Service documents up to 20 years old to be valid evidence of the Russian military's behavior in subsequent battles in the Ukraine war, says security expert Ulrich Kuhn of the university's Institute for Peace and Security Policy Research. Hamburg said ZDF He expressed; That is, little has changed in the basic considerations of Russian military strategists to this day.

“The moment the front collapses, things get difficult,” Cohen says. In this situation, Russia uses the threat of nuclear weapons as a deterrent to influence its opponents. In his opinion, the reoccupation of Crimea could be a starting point that could lead to the use of nuclear weapons. (Priest)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

War | Belgorod: Ukraine bombs a Russian city

Published

on

War |  Belgorod: Ukraine bombs a Russian city

Ukraine bombs targets in Russia. Poland arrests a Russian soldier on the border. All information in the news blog.

The most important things at a glance


download…

inclusion

Parliament in Kyiv approves the use of prisoners on the front

6:02 AM: The Ukrainian parliament approved a bill allowing the deployment of prisoners to the front. As MP Olena Shuljak announced on Facebook, deputies in Kiev voted in favor of the project in the second reading with 279 yes votes.

In exchange for amnesty, this allows imprisoned criminals to be deployed in the ranks of the Ukrainian armed forces on the front. According to Shuljak, this should only happen on a voluntary basis. In addition, those affected may have less than three years of imprisonment remaining. Dangerous criminals imprisoned for multiple murders, rapes or attacks on national security are not given the opportunity.

Deputy Shuliak emphasizes that before the operation is performed, the physical and mental condition of the prisoners is also examined. Before the law enters into force, it must be signed by the Speaker of Parliament and the President of the Republic.

Ukraine bombs Russian targets – fires and casualties

5:48 AM: According to Russian sources, a Ukrainian drone attack caused a fire in a refinery in the Russian Krasnodar region. The regional administration said via the short message service „Telegram” that about six drones were shot down, but the debris fell on the refinery near the village of Yurovka and led to a fire. Several tanks were damaged.

Great Britain wants to expel the Russian military attaché

8:38 pm: Britain announced the imminent expulsion of the Russian military attaché. In fact, he is a „little-known military intelligence officer,” Home Secretary James Cleverley said in Parliament in London. A military attaché is a member of the armed forces who serves in an embassy and represents his country’s defense sector abroad.

Cleverley also announced that several Russian properties on British soil that London suspected were being used for „intelligence purposes” would lose their diplomatic status. Cleverly also reveals “new restrictions on Russian diplomatic visas”, in particular limiting the amount of time Russian diplomats can spend in the UK. The Russian ambassador was summoned and informed of the procedures.

Russia rejects the accusations against military attaché Maxim Ilovik and criticizes the loss of diplomatic status for Russian properties. „London decided to justify its anti-Russian measures with lies,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in Moscow. It announced a „strong response” from Russia without going into details.

GPS interference: Estonia appoints Russian charge d’affaires

7:23 pm: Estonia has summoned the Chargé d’Affaires of the Russian Embassy in Tallinn due to a disruption in GPS satellite navigation in the Baltic Sea region. Foreign Minister Margos Tsahkna said in Tallinn that so-called jamming – that is, active disruption of the signal – by Russia is becoming increasingly common. This causes confusion and has a major impact on civil aviation. Aircraft use a Global Positioning System (GPS) signal to determine their location and for navigation.

Continue Reading

World

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?

Published

on

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?
[–>

Der Beginn des Europawahlkampfs der österreichischen Grünen ist von Turbulenzen um Spitzenkandidatin Lena Schilling überlagert worden. Am Mittwoch erschien in der österreichischen Zeitung „Der Standard“ ein Bericht, in dem Schilling zwar keine rechtlichen – oder im engeren Sinne politischen – Vorwürfe gemacht werden, aber in dem ein äußerst ungünstiges Charakterbild gezeichnet wird.

[–>

Die Grünen sahen sich veranlasst, am Mittwoch kurzfristig eine Pressekonferenz einzuberufen, auf der sich die Parteispitze mit markigen Worten hinter ihre Europa-Spitzenkandidatin stellt. Der Grünen-Vorsitzende und Vizekanzler Werner Kogler sprach von einem „anonymen Gemurkse“ und „Gefurze“, durch das man sich nicht beeindrucken lassen werde.

[–>

Anlass der Berichterstattung ist eine gerichtliche Unterlassungserklärung, mit der sich Schilling verpflichtet, bestimmte Behauptungen über Personen aus ihrem privaten Umfeld nicht mehr zu verbreiten. Daran anknüpfend zitiert die Zeitung mehrere anonyme Gesprächspartner in einer Weise, die es nahelegt, dass die junge politische Quereinsteigerin – bekanntgeworden als Klimaaktivistin – häufiger falsche abträgliche Behauptungen über andere Personen in die Welt setze. Schilling mochte sich in der Sache nicht äußern, da es sich um ihr Privatleben handle. Es werde gegen sie mit Gerüchten und Unterstellungen „kampagnisiert“.

[–>[–>

Zeitung kritisiert Reaktion des Parteivorsitzenden

[–>

Die Chefredaktion des linksliberalen Blattes rügte ihrerseits, dass der Grünen-Vorsitzende journalistische Arbeit als „Gefurze“ bezeichne. Man könne jede behauptete Einzelheit belegen. Veröffentlicht wurde – bei geschwärzten Namen – die Unterlassungserklärung. In dem Artikel wird ausführlich begründet, warum man sich entschlossen habe, in dieser Weise über Dinge zu berichten, die die Privatsphäre berühren. Schilling sei Spitzenkandidatin, werde wahrscheinlich ins Europaparlament einziehen und könnte dort die österreichische Grünen-Delegation anführen. Daher sei sie eine Person öffentlichen Interesses, und es sei relevant, wie sie sich gegenüber Kollegen und auch Medien verhalte.

READ  Are the protests in France diminishing or are they just beginning?

[–>

In einem Fall geht es darum, dass sie einem Journalisten sexuelle Belästigung vorgeworfen haben soll. Der Mann sei von einer Kündigung bedroht gewesen, doch habe eine Untersuchung durch seinen Arbeitgeber keine Hinweise darauf ergeben, dass an dem Vorwurf etwas dran sei.

[–>[–>

Die Grünen sprachen hingegen von einer „organisierten Kampagne“. Die Fraktionsvorsitzende Sigrid Maurer meinte, das sei auch direkt gegen junge Frauen gerichtet. Klimaschutzministerin Leonore Gewessler bezeichnete die Vorwürfe als „hemmungslos“. Schilling selbst äußerte, dass sie lieber über politische Inhalte diskutieren wolle, nämlich den Klimaschutz.

Continue Reading

World

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense? Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power

Published

on

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense?  Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

The Crimean Bridge is a symbol of power for Putin – and a tempting target for Ukraine. But a Ukrainian intelligence expert recommends a different strategy in the war.

Kiev – The Russian regime warned of a „devastating retaliatory strike” if Ukraine attacks the Russian-annexed Crimea peninsula or the Crimean bridgehead again. The reason: There is speculation in Russia that Ukraine may be planning a major attack – on the occasion of “Victory Day,” which Russia marks on May 9 with an exhibition of captured military equipment. A simultaneous attack on the bridge connecting the peninsula to mainland Russia, It would be humiliating Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This was announced by a Ukrainian military intelligence officer in the British newspaper in April Watchman To: “We will destroy the bridge in the first half of 2024” The destruction of the bridge, which has already been attacked twice, is “inevitable.”

Now a Ukrainian intelligence expert is explicitly warning against destroying the Crimean Bridge. This is not out of fear of Putin’s revenge, but because he considers this a waste of Ukraine’s already scarce military resources.

A tempting war target: the Crimean Bridge has been attacked repeatedly – ​​as happened here in October 2022. © Uncredited/AP/dpa

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” Warning against wrong tactics in the Ukraine war

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” asks Ivan Stupak, a former employee of the Ukrainian Internal Intelligence Service. Interview with Ukrainian News Agency Union. Destroying the Crimean Bridge will be complex and difficult. The bridge was repeatedly damaged in previous attacks, but has since been restored. „It’s not doing well.”

READ  Are the protests in France diminishing or are they just beginning?

Stupak believes that future attempts to destroy the bridge would be a waste of energy. Especially since Russia has now responded: it is clear that Putin’s army is no longer using the bridge for military purposes.

A Ukrainian open source agency recently found using satellite images that far fewer trains pass through the Kerch Bridge than in the past. Instead, Russia is now increasingly using land routes into the annexed areas of eastern Ukraine to supply the front lines of the Ukrainian war.

The head of Ukrainian domestic intelligence, Wasyl Malik, said in March 2024 that Russia would no longer use the Crimean bridge to deliver weapons. Trains that passed the bridge now transport only people and consumer goods.

The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war.
The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war. © Konstantin Mihalchevsky/Imago

In the war against Russia, Ukraine should attack other targets instead of the Crimean bridgehead

Ukrainian military expert Stupak recommends in an interview with Union Therefore, no more missiles and ammunition are wasted on attacks on the Kerch Bridge. Instead, the Ukrainian military should attack Russian targets whose destruction would be of greater benefit. Stupak cites „headquarters and depots” as examples, as well as air defense complexes, aircraft and airfields.

For example, if Ukraine destroyed a Russian S300 anti-aircraft missile complex, this would directly help Ukrainian defense: Russia could then immediately shoot down fewer Ukrainian planes and drop fewer missiles on soldiers, “meaning we don’t lose.” Any military or military forces.” Civilians. This is a great added value. This is also a direct effect.” Because they meant to “destroy Putin’s money.”

Experts recommend launching attacks on Russian fighter planes instead of the Crimean bridge

The Ukrainian expert said that the most important thing for Ukrainian defense in the war against Russia is the destruction of Russian fighter planes carrying high-explosive glide bombs. As a result of Russia’s use of so-called FAB bombs, the Ukrainian city of Avdiivka fell, which could now be repeated in the currently besieged city of Chasiv Yar.

The military expert warns that FAF glide bombs will penetrate Ukrainian defenses “like can launchers.” Therefore, Ukraine must destroy Russian combat aircraft directly where they are stationed or when they approach Ukraine. Stupak said that would be a „great advantage and opportunity to stop the Russian advance,” unlike the elaborate attacks on the Crimean bridge.

The latter, Stupak sees, are primarily PR campaigns “for Facebook”: “There will then be likes, memes and reposts for two days,” “But what will it bring us and how will it affect the situation at the front?” Decisive. (SMU)

Continue Reading

Trending