Connect with us

World

Bundestag statement: Schulz shuts down Lambrecht-Mers calls for impeachment

Published

on

Bundestag statement: Schulz shuts down Lambrecht-Mers calls for impeachment

It is interesting who Olaf Schulz did not mention in the German Bundestag that day. He thanks Robert Habeck for trying to stay away from Russian oil and gas, as he wants to rapidly expand wind power on land and at sea. He even thanks Friedrich Merz for his constructive work to jointly anchor the 100 billion special funds of the Bundeswehr in the Basic Law.

[Alle aktuellen Nachrichten zum russischen Angriff auf die Ukraine bekommen Sie mit der Tagesspiegel-App live auf ihr Handy. Hier für Apple- und Android-Geräte herunterladen.]

In his previous speeches, he also thanked his Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht (SPD) for her commitment to passing private funds and arms deliveries to Ukraine. Now Scholz doesn’t say a word to her. No thanks nothing. Are these withdrawal movements?

Lambrecht reads the files on the government bench, but this day is presented after the statement of the chancellor’s government, which he made because of the EU special summit on 30/31. May, more unpleasant news for you. Especially with the advent of Frederick Mers: There is now „a minister here who has more to do with self-defense than defense for weeks”, says the leader of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group.

Embarrassing details of an uninformed and uninterested minister have been leaked to the media from the German army. He asks the chancellor to give up on Lambrecht. The counselor is going to have to do that anyway, so it’s best if he does it now.

Does Lambrecht still have power?

He said that in three years she would be said to have done a good job. Scholz is known for his loyalty, she was his pick. But can things go well? Does she still have the power in the band to carry out his political turning point? The advisor is – still – undeterred. It is preferable to draw large lines.

READ  The US military prevents a dangerous attack on Israel

„Our cooperation with the economically powerful democracies, the G7, has rarely been as effective and extensive as it has been during the past few days and weeks under our presidency,” he stressed. US President Joe Biden has played a major role in this – especially with regard to NATO, but in the fall, Democrats are threatened with defeat in congressional elections, and Donald Trump is working on his return.

Frederic Merz calls for her dismissal: Christine Lambrecht, Minister of Defense, leaves the public hall at …Photo: Michael Cappeler / d

A CDU politician tempts the Freedom and Democracy Party and the Green Party with Jamaica

Therefore, Western unity is not safe, just like the one in the Schulze alliance in Berlin. When he looks into the eyes of his fellow FDP, „I see a deep yearning for Jamaica. And I can understand it,” CDU Representative Christophe de Vries tweeted during the debate.

After the state elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, the Federation is in the lead and constantly asserts that there is also the sporting possibility of an alliance in the Bundestag. It is notable that the applause of Schulz’s speech by the Greens and the FDP appears almost docile.

Schulz makes stern statements to Putin

Schulz sets his course stoically, but he also has some news in his bags. He talks about many messages and discussions with concerned citizens. But he also wanted to make one thing clear: “Helping a country that has been brutally attacked to defend itself is not an escalation. It is a contribution to repelling the attack – and thus ending the violence as quickly as possible.”

Vladimir Putin still thinks he can bomb a foregone conclusion. But he is wrong, just as he was wrong about the determination of the Ukrainians and the unity of our alliances. There will be no peace for granted. Because the Ukrainians do not accept it, and neither do we.”

READ  CHEERSON: Russians report complete withdrawal - Dnipro bridge collapses

Only when Putin realizes he cannot break Ukraine’s defenses will he be willing to seriously negotiate peace. That is why we are strengthening Ukraine’s back, militarily as well. He is not talking about a face-saving solution, he wants the Russians to withdraw all forces to the borders before February 24. There are no differences in the union at all.

the ultimate goal; No peace imposed, NATO will not become a party to the war

The guiding principle is: considered, controlled and internationally coordinated. This does not mean that the Germans act alone, „everything we do should harm Russia more than us and our partners.” What makes NATO a party to the war, such as the imposition of a no-fly zone, is not done. We will secure and strengthen our defensive ability.”

More on Ukraine war on Tagesspiegel Plus:

You need special funds for that. After it was not possible to agree with the union (which is necessary to amend the Basic Law by a two-thirds majority) on the expenditure details, a vote is now taken in the budget week at the beginning of June. “We are having good conversations about this, as well as with your party, dear Mr. Merz. I am grateful for that,” said Schulze, looking at his opponent.

Merz’s facial expressions say a lot

Merz’s facial expressions and body language illustrate his opinion of this advisor. He now has a strong relationship on the part of the SPD, at least with the leader of the parliamentary group Rolf Mutzenich, who is always looking for contact in order to reach an agreement.

Scholz’s welcome received the greatest applause of the Finns and Sweden for their desire to join NATO. The slogan “one for all, all for one” is what makes the transatlantic alliance so attractive. “Dear friends in Sweden and Finland, you are welcome. With you on our side, NATO and Europe will be stronger and safer.”

READ  Israel Live Tape: ++ Israel uses Arrow 3 missile system for the first time ++
Tough times: Chancellor Olaf Schulz (Social Democratic Party) moved to the government seat in the Bundestag after his government’s statement.Photo: Kay Nitfield/D

Solidarity Fund Yes, Ukraine’s rapid accession to the European Union No

Announced the EU Solidarity Fund for Ukraine. „Reconstruction (…) will cost billions.” Meanwhile, making it clear that there can be no quick accession to the European Union, Macron initially has something like a privileged partnership.

Schultz stresses that „the fact that there are no shortcuts on the way to the European Union is also a demand for justice towards the six countries of the Western Balkans.” And almost accidentally, he said something that Chancellor Angela Merkel hadn’t dared do lately: change the EU’s treaties — to herald a turning point for Europe, too.

„Citizens want, for example, more consistency in climate protection, progress in European defense, and a more equitable and inclusive Europe with more social cooperation.” The principle of consensus is also a thorn in his side, so Hungary has blocked the oil embargo until now.

[Der Nachrichtenüberblick aus der Hauptstadt: Schon rund 57.000 Leserinnen und Leser informieren sich zweimal täglich mit unseren kompakten überregionalen Newslettern. Melden Sie sich jetzt kostenlos hier an.]

Schulz also wants a new era in the EU – by changing contracts?

If required, we can talk about changing treaties, including agreement. This is not a taboo.” Since this was the most important topic in the state elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, he emphasized that the fight against inflation is also a top priority; that the abolition of the EEG surcharge, and the fixed energy price of 300 euros (which does not Pensioners get it, the union complains), and tax deductions on packing, social benefits and a 9-euro ticket in local transport also shouldn’t be the last word.

The chancellery is looking forward to autumn when the bills for the extra costs arrive. And the traffic light, especially the FJP, but it wants to go back to the debt brake for the 2023 budget.

Frederick Merz accuses the chancellor of playing a double game in handing over guns.Photo: IMAGO / Political Moments

Merz dissected by Scholz

Friedrich Merz remains true to himself, as last time, he begins his speech with a quote from Scholz. „I’m not going to join a group of people doing something for a while with a photoshoot,” the RTL consultant said on the topic of the long-term visit to Kyiv. Who does that mean? European heads of government, his foreign minister or the head of the Bundestag?

This leads to harassment of the parliamentary group of the Social Democratic Party. Replica Merz: „Your nerves are really on edge after the last election on Sunday.” Sauerland again explains Schulze, above all, on the subject of arms delivery, but he was not always up to date himself.

Chancellery: Merz is not in the movie

„The truth is that almost nothing has been delivered from Germany in the past few weeks.” There is no ammunition for the Gepard anti-aircraft tank, nothing happens with the exchange of rings. “What double game is really being played in the federal government?” says Merz.

In Chancellery, they say both are wrong, and Merz must have made old rhetorical notes.

It is said in Schultz’s environment that the Gibbard tanks will be delivered after the training of Ukrainian soldiers in Germany – with sufficient ammunition. But the question of where the ammunition suddenly came from – so far it has been forbidden to transport from the country of production Switzerland – remains unanswered. Training on a complex system can also take a long time.

However, the truth is the circular exchange is expanding, so there’s a lot going on here. Merz may have missed it, but the day before, Lambrecht was able to announce that Germany would give the Czech Republic 15 Leopard tanks so that the Czech Republic, in turn, could deliver heavy equipment the Ukrainians already knew about to the war zone. The Ukrainian government also now clearly commends Germany’s contributions.

But the question these days remains as to how long Lambrecht can still announce such news about this ring exchange – and that depends above all on how long Scholz holds his hand.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

Consequences of Russia's losses in the Ukraine war

Published

on

Consequences of Russia's losses in the Ukraine war
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

This photo, published by state news agency Sputnik via AP, shows Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting in the Kremlin. © Alliance photo / German Press Agency / Pol Sputnik Kremlin / AFP | Gabriel Grigorov

Vladimir Putin must accept resistance from his own ranks in the Ukraine war. Russian organizations help deserters and report an increase in their numbers.

Kiev/Moscow – “Get Lost” is the name of a Russian initiative that supports deserters from the Russian army. “We live in a world today where the Russian army brings nothing but death and destruction. Escaping from the army is the best way to help your country.” With these words, the organization addresses Russia's soldiers.

According to opposition media Novaya Gazeta More and more soldiers are doing it: while in January 2023, according to Get Lost, only 28 men were looking for support, the number has increased tenfold within a year. In January 2024, 284 soldiers arrived at the deserter contact point.

Organization helping those fleeing the Ukraine war: “We receive new inquiries every day”

“Idite Jeslom,” translated as “walking through the forest,” is the name of another Russian organization that takes care of deserters. Employee Ivan Shulyaev says they have already been in contact with more than 30,000 men. A quarter of the cases involved soldiers who were already at the front and wanted to escape the operation. Others contacted her after receiving the recall notice. In an interview with the magazine geography He said he did not initially expect the commitment to last so long.

“When we started with seven people, we thought we would do this for a few months, dealing with urgent cases. And that was it. But we receive new requests every day, and we cannot stop. These people do not want to have anything to do with Vladimir Putin and have nothing to do with the war.” In his estimation, the people were not interested in the war at first, but now they felt like hostages of their government and he now worked from abroad to strengthen the anti-war movement in Russia.

Putin's toughness towards those fleeing Russia – almost no protection in Germany according to ProAsyl

He says desertion and resistance have become an increasing problem for the Russian military in the Ukraine war Novaya Gazeta. According to another Russian portal. mediazonaDespite Vladimir Putin's tightening of regulations, desertions increased by 400 percent in one year.

A soldier who left with the help of another organization called Ivan says he still knows many soldiers who are happy even after more than two years on the front. But not everyone: “Escape from the front is very dangerous. People are fully aware that there are criminal consequences, but that does not stop them. Some pretend to be one of the dead or wounded, and some may harm themselves to escape.

Those fleeing Russia come to Armenia, Kazakhstan, Serbia and Turkey

Incidentally, only a small percentage of those who have fled come to the EU: people on the front will be helped to flee to Kazakhstan, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan, says Chulyaev of Idite Jeslom. high ProAsylum About 250,000 men have fled since the beginning of the war, often to Serbia or Türkiye. Some of them, for example from Kazakhstan, were deported to Russia. Nearly 3,500 men of military age were due to apply for asylum in Germany by August 2023.

While Germany was open to accepting Russian deserters in the first year of the Ukraine war, e.g Daily news I mentioned, apparently not much happened. Non-governmental organization Supported asylum Complain about it though Changes in decision-making practice As of 2023, there is still little protection for those fleeing Russia in Germany. In November 2023, Russian soldiers fled Crimea, wounding the deputy commander of their regiment. (cat)

READ  Big losses for Russia - Putin critic considers Bakhmut's invasion 'meaningless'
Continue Reading

World

A military economist sees a strategic defeat for Ukraine for Putin

Published

on

A military economist sees a strategic defeat for Ukraine for Putin
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

A military economist believes that time is running out for Russian President Vladimir Putin in the Ukraine war. This is also why there are increasing calls for peace in the West.

COLOGNE – When we look at the war in Ukraine, people increasingly imagine that Vladimir Putin is just trying to buy time. Because the head of the Kremlin knows that Russia is significantly superior to its invaded neighbor.

That is why Germany's opponents of arms deliveries to Kiev often say that this will only prolong death and suffering indefinitely. The best that could happen to Ukraine is a negotiated peace that would also allow Moscow's ruler to save face.

Putin and the Ukrainian war: “Like Hitler, he must win in the short term”

Marcus MQ turns the tables. In the meeting with Cologne Rundschau The military economist confirms that the clock is actually ticking against Putin. The 71-year-old has long been personally determined to be a loser.

The Freiburg native compares World War II to another aggressive and inhumane dictator: Adolf Hitler. “Putin faces the same problem as Hitler,” says Cube. “He has to win in the short term, because in the long term he has no chance against the industrial potential of the West.” That is exactly why Putin is burning systems and people on a massive scale at the front.

Vladimir Putin has to endure this comparison often: Military economist Markus MQ also sees similarities between Adolf Hitler and the head of the Kremlin. © imago/montage

Military expert compares World War II: “Putin does it like Marshal Sokov”

Keough is convinced: “He wants to make a decision before the whole huge arms industry takes off in the entire Western world. About 80 years ago, something similar happened to the United States when Washington intervened to stop Hitler: “It took years to ramp it up.” The American defense industry. And it did not The maximum is reached only in 1945, at the end of the war.

READ  Air warning in many regions: “swarms” of suicide drones are approaching Ukraine

Putin also acted as the Soviet Union did at the time against Nazi Germany – even if those countries were initially fighting to liberate their territories. „What is Putin doing there?“The tsars did it, and then Marshal (Georgy) Zhukov in World War II,” recalls the lecturer at the Military Academy at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. “If 30,000 people fall in a wave of attacks, it means ‘it doesn’t matter to him, in the end’ The survivors were able to regain their new positions.

A person sits on a destroyed Russian tank
It did not survive the Russian attack on Ukraine: there are several destroyed tanks sent by the Kremlin to the Kharkiv region. © imago

Present The Kremlin's tactic of relying on the massesIt also has consequences for Kiev: “If Russia continues like this, Ukraine will have to mobilize at some point, even if it is difficult for democracy.” A million men.” Their time has not yet come: “At the moment, it is cheaper for them to rely on wear and tear.”

Military economist Q sees new tactics: „The Kremlin's parrots are shouting loudly again”

But not least because of the $1 billion US aid package approved in the House of Representatives after months of stalemate, the sun is starting to shine brighter again for Kiev. Additionally, despite the shift to a war economy, Russia has shown its limits, as Cube asserts: “Russian warfare is getting worse and worse technologically.”

The soldiers will be sent „with old T62 tanks without a turret and some in golf carts.” The reserve of about 3,000 tanks has been exhausted, and satellite images show that pipes in artillery camps are missing and systems have been dismantled.

READ  Tourists flee wildfires at sea

“I would say that Russia can definitely continue the war in 2024 and 2025,” Cube estimates. “But they are increasingly facing a time problem.” One indication of this for him is that “the Kremlin’s parrots are starting to shout loudly again, with the usual slogans: Negotiate peace, and Ukraine cannot win.” And so on. The AfD in particular could feel directed here.

Putin before the end? Expert Cube is betting heavily on Russia's defeat in the Ukraine war

Putin has already realized that Russia will be inferior to Ukraine and its allies: “That is why he is trying to sabotage the Western logistical base by transforming countries politically and playing the German emotional keyboard so that the Germans feel afraid.”

But Cube is certain: “If the Western logistical base continues to grow, Russia will not only win the war, but also lose it. With all the ensuing consequences for the internal organization in Russia.”

Young men playing with a destroyed tank in a settlement
Left behind: Young men enjoy this Russian tank in the Ukrainian city of Mykolaiv. © imago

Cube points out that this may mean the end of Putin's power, but it may be a disservice to his main supporters. By ending the war. Russia will decline economically and will have to unite internally again. “But the rule of the Siloviki, the group currently leading Russia, will continue,” the author explains the way to avoid impending unrest in the country.

The end of the Ukrainian war: According to Cube, Russia's strategic defeat has been certain since the fall of 2023

Cube is certain that the Ukraine war could end any day. It is in Putin's hands. However, there is reason to doubt whether the Kremlin's seemingly all-powerful head is really prepared to go down in history as the biggest loser who sent countless people to their deaths and, on top of that, divided two former sister states for more than a year. A decade for his own purposes.

According to Cube, Russia strategically lost the Ukraine war in the fall of 2023: “By then it had become clear that the rate of production could not keep up with the rate of attrition.” He had already started the war in the fall of 2023, and it had to stop, as if he simply didn't want to accept that time was against him. (mg)

Continue Reading

World

Ceasefire negotiations: US President Biden calls on mediators to put pressure on Hamas

Published

on

Ceasefire negotiations: US President Biden calls on mediators to put pressure on Hamas

The president is ours Joe Biden It called on Egypt and Qatar to put pressure on Hamas to release the hostages within the framework of negotiations for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. The presidential office called on both countries to do everything in their power to secure the release of hostages held by the terrorist organization. This is the only obstacle to an immediate ceasefire. Qatar and Egypt, along with the United States of America, are considered important mediating countries in the conflict.

According to the information, Biden spoke by phone with the Emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi about the currently proposed proposal. Representatives of Egypt, Qatar and From Hamas It met in Cairo on Monday, and the Palestinian Islamic Organization has not yet responded to the proposal.

French news agencies and Reuters unanimously reported the delegation of the extremist Islamic organization Cairo I left for Doha, where Hamas's political office is located. Hamas must respond „as quickly as possible.”

Blinken and Cameron point to Israel's „generous” offer.

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken appeared “optimistic” on Monday that Hamas would accept the ceasefire proposal Gaza strip He agrees to release the hostages. He said during a visit to Riyadh that the proposal was “very generous” from the Israeli side.

READ  CHEERSON: Russians report complete withdrawal - Dnipro bridge collapses

British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said that the proposal calls for a 40-day ceasefire. Hamas makes „a very generous offer of a 40-day ceasefire” and the release of „thousands of potential Palestinian prisoners” in exchange for the release of the remaining hostages. Israel It was submitted.

Negotiations regarding a ceasefire and the release of Hamas hostages have been continuing for months. As part of the only agreement reached so far between Israel and Hamas brokered by the United States, Qatar and Egypt, about a hundred hostages were released in exchange for the release of Palestinian prisoners during a week-long ceasefire at the end of November.

The war in the Gaza Strip broke out as a result of the unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7 by the extremist Islamic movement Hamas, which has been designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and the United States. According to Israeli information, about 1,170 people were killed and about 250 others were taken hostage in the Gaza Strip. According to Israel, there are still 129 people in the Gaza Strip, and the army estimates that 34 of them have been killed.

Since then, Israel has been carrying out military operations in the Gaza Strip in response to the Hamas attack. According to the Hamas-controlled Ministry of Health, which cannot be independently verified, more than 34,400 people have been killed.

READ  Israel Live Tape: ++ Israel uses Arrow 3 missile system for the first time ++
Continue Reading

Trending