Connect with us

World

Withdrawal of forces despite NATO concerns: Russia exposes its external borders

Published

on

Withdrawal of forces despite NATO concerns: Russia exposes its external borders

Russia has deployed thousands of soldiers in neighboring countries and along important borders for decades. But the Ukraine war has exhausted divisions in strategically important locations because President Vladimir Putin needs as many soldiers as possible in Ukraine.

In the far north, Russia shares a border with NATO member Norway. It is less than 200 kilometers long, but it remains geopolitically explosive, especially since the Kremlin forces invaded Ukraine.

But due to the need for as many soldiers as possible in Ukraine, Russia has now almost completely withdrawn its military forces from the border with Norway. Norwegian Chief of General Staff Erik Christophersen said last week that only a maximum of 20% of the soldiers who were stationed here before the war in Ukraine were still at the site.

Kristofferson is convinced that the decision to regroup forces shows primarily that Putin does not actually see any threat in NATO. “If he thought we were a threat to Russia, he would not have sent his troops to war in Ukraine.”

“Russia knows that NATO does not pose a threat.”

NATO Military Committee Chairman Admiral Rob Bauer added that the same applies to the 1,300-kilometre-long border with Finland. „Russia knows that NATO does not pose a threat because we have no intention of attacking them. Otherwise, they would have reacted completely differently to Finland joining NATO,” he added.

In April this year, Moscow initially announced an increase in its military presence near the border. But nothing happened; Instead, Putin’s forces appear to need every available soldier in Ukraine.

This also applies to military units in Kaliningrad. The region is located between Poland, Lithuania and Belarus on the Baltic Sea. The Russian enclave has been an important military outpost for Moscow for decades. Russia has now significantly reduced the number of its troops here as well – the reason is the shortage of soldiers on the front in Ukraine.

READ  At least 78 killed in a stampede in Yemen

Fewer soldiers in separatist areas

Russia’s military presence in Georgia’s separatist regions has also decreased. Moscow has considered the self-declared Republic of South Ossetia to be an independent state since 2008. As a result, Russia has deployed soldiers in the region that broke away from Georgia. However, there are now reports from Georgia that there is almost no military presence anymore. He added: „If we were monitoring the bases currently, we could clearly see that there were very few individuals stationed there.” “Lasha Beridze said on Euronews. The colonel of the Georgian Army Reserve assumes that Russia has given priority to sending soldiers to the front in Ukraine.

This also applies to the second breakaway region on Georgian territory. Since the Georgia War in 2008, Russia has deployed about 1,300 soldiers in Abkhazia. But it also appears that the Russian Armed Forces have reduced the number of their forces in this breakaway region, as a European Union monitoring mission in Georgia recently reported. “They also transferred a lot of technology,” mission commander Dimitrios Karaballis said in August.

Uncertainty about Belarus

Belarus is a special case. According to Ukrainian information, the number of Kremlin forces in the country belonging to Putin’s loyal ally Alexander Lukashenko has also decreased recently. Kyiv announced this in the summer Almost all Russian forces withdrew from Belarus He was.

However, in mid-August, several hundred soldiers arrived in the neighboring country again to participate in a major military exercise conducted by the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in September. According to opposition media in Belarus, about 2,000 Russian soldiers reside in four military bases in the country.

But at the beginning of this month, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu suddenly announced that the planned Zapad exercises would be canceled this year, and that „the exercises will take place in Ukraine instead.” The British Ministry of Defense had already anticipated this move in advance because the Russians had very few forces at their disposal.

READ  Moscow should not be able to take care of the wounded Russians

Tajikistan is no longer a buffer zone?

In another former Soviet country, Russia is no longer the strong player it was in recent days. Moscow has played an important role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan for decades, and has deployed so-called peacekeeping forces in Armenia since 2020. Stefan Mallerius, who heads the “Regional Program for Political Dialogue in the South Caucasus” of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, said in an interview. Recently: “It is clear that the Kremlin has been the protecting power of Armenia for more than 30 years, and now Putin is working with Azerbaijan.” ntv.de. It is unclear what will happen to Moscow’s approximately 2,000 soldiers in Armenia in the medium term.

Russia has also lost its power potential in Tajikistan. About 7,000 soldiers were originally stationed in the Central Asian country because the Kremlin considers Tajikistan a buffer zone against Afghanistan in the south. The base is one of the largest outside Russia. However, I already mentioned it last summer „Radio Free Europe”Russia withdrew just over 2,000 soldiers and sent them to Ukraine. It is not known whether there have been further troop transfers since then.

Putin also ordered the withdrawal of some of his forces from neighboring Kyrgyzstan. It is estimated that up to 500 Russian soldiers are stationed here. Most of them came from the Republic of Tuva in southern Siberia, one of the poorest regions in Russia. Search by „Radio Free Europe” They show that „at least 90 Tuvan soldiers” were first taken to the military base in Kant in Kyrgyzstan and from there sent to Ukraine – „against their will.”

READ  Armenia and Azerbaijan - fear of expulsion from Nagorno-Karabakh

Withdrawal of military equipment from the Pacific island

The extent of Russia’s regrouping is also demonstrated by the transfer of military equipment. Moscow recently withdrew air defense systems from the strategically important Kuril Islands, an archipelago north of Japan claimed equally by Russia and Japan. This is shown through satellite images evaluated by Japanese political scientist Yu Koizumi.

In 2020, the Russian military deployed several systems on the 1,200-kilometre-long island chain. It is suspected that Russia now needs S-300 air defense systems in the west of the country to protect itself from Ukrainian air attacks.

In addition, military equipment is also said to have disappeared from the North Pacific island of Sakhalin, as satellite images also show. Old Soviet tanks and howitzers were stationed here until recently, but now, according to Japanese reports, they are said to be repaired and maintained in surrounding factories. Tanks and howitzers are likely to be used in Ukraine as well.

„I Learned Something Again” Podcast.

“I Learned Something Again” is a podcast for those who are curious: Why might the ceasefire be just a break for Vladimir Putin? Why does NATO fear the Suwalki gap? Why does Russia have iPhones again? What small behavioral changes can save 15 percent energy? Listen and be smarter three times a week.

You can find all episodes in the NTV app RTL+, Apple Podcast And Spotify. „Something Learned Again” is also included. Amazon Music And Google Podcast available. For all other podcast apps, you can use the RSS feed.

do you have a question? Please email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

Donald Trump: Trump’s trial in the documents case has been postponed until further notice

Published

on

Donald Trump: Trump’s trial in the documents case has been postponed until further notice

The official start of the trial of the former US President Donald Trump The case surrounding the taking of secret government documents has been postponed indefinitely. The presiding judge, Eileen Cannon, announced in a letter on Tuesday that the previously scheduled start of the trial on May 20 had been cancelled. The reason for this is the open legal questions. Therefore, the process is unlikely to begin before the presidential elections in November.

Last year, a grand jury agreed to indict Trump. the Indictment Against Trump includes 37 points; 31 of them fall under the Espionage Act, America’s espionage law. The former president is also charged with, among other things, participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice and making false statements. Trump is the first former (or sitting) president to be indicted at the federal level.

Illegal storage of confidential documents

In this case, Trump was accused of illegally storing highly sensitive information since his presidency (2017 to 2021). In August 2022, FBI federal police searched Trump’s villa in Florida and seized several sets of documents classified as top secret. Trump is also accused of conspiring to obstruct the investigation: he is said to have tried to hide material from surveillance cameras and take boxes of documents with the help of employees.

Trump is also said to have carelessly kept secret documents and opened them on his property in Florida. The Justice Department posted photos of boxes stacked around the toilet, including the marble floor of one of Trump’s bathrooms. They have almost reached the Pleiades. Trump also appears to have shown two documents to other people without proper security clearance; It contained plans for an attack on Iran and a military map.

READ  Ukraine destroys Putin's factory - the factory is located 1,300 kilometers across the border

The responsible judge sees legal issues that still need clarification

Judge Cannon, who is in charge of the documents process, was appointed by Trump. Critics accuse it of prolonging the process and processing requests in slow motion. As justification for delaying the start of the trial, Cannon wrote that setting a trial date at this point would be “unwise.” There are a lot of open legal questions that still need to be clarified. It will take proper preparation and time to fully and fairly address this issue in order to present this case to a jury.

The current decision is considered a success for the Republican Party, as it is trying to delay the start of the trial as much as possible in the context of the presidential election campaign. Trump currently has to answer in a New York court regarding hush money payments to a porn actress.

Continue Reading

World

Putin’s fifth inauguration leads to a split in the European Union

Published

on

Putin’s fifth inauguration leads to a split in the European Union

To share or not? A poisoned invitation: Putin’s fifth inauguration leads to a split in the European Union

Putin in a festive mood: Kremlin head in March 2021 at a concert marking the 7th anniversary of the „reunification” of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol with Russia at Luzhniki Stadium

© Alexey Druzhinin / Russian Presidential Press and Information Office / TASS / ImageImago

Should I accept Putin’s invitation to start his new term or not? A diplomatic topic for discussion in the European Union. According to diplomats, Germany and France do not agree either.

There are major disagreements within the European Union about how to properly deal with invitations to attend the celebration marking the beginning of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s fifth term in office. As several EU diplomats told the German news agency in Brussels on Monday, countries such as France, Hungary and Slovakia would like to send representatives to attend Putin’s swearing-in in order to keep communication channels open. However, Germany and many other EU countries consider participation inappropriate, especially in light of Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine. “Germany will not participate in this event,” a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman in Berlin said on Monday.

In the case of the Federal Republic, the government summoned the German ambassador in Moscow, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, to Berlin for a week-long consultations in the wake of cyberattacks on the Social Democratic Party and German companies. The federal government blames a Russian military intelligence unit for the attacks.

To share or not? This is the question in the European Union

The official representative of the European Union in Moscow, like most ambassadors of EU member states, will not attend the ceremony on Tuesday, a spokesman for the European External Action Service said late in the evening in Brussels. Foreign Affairs Representative Josep Borrell had previously spoken against the EU’s participation in the event. But according to diplomats, there were also dissenting voices. Among other things, they are said to have warned that staying away from the ceremony could give Russia an excuse to ignore more diplomatic rules and norms in the future.

Putin – and who else?

Putin wants to be sworn in for another term as Russian president on Tuesday morning. This marks the beginning of another six years as head of state. The ceremony will be held in the Moscow Kremlin in front of representatives of the government, both houses of the Russian Parliament and other high-level guests. 71-year-old Putin, who has dominated politics in the country for 24 years, achieved a record result of more than 87 percent of the votes in the presidential elections that took place last March.

The European Union strongly criticized the conduct of the elections. Russian voters have very limited access to factual information and “have no real choice,” a statement said. The reason for this was, among other things, the exclusion of many candidates – including all those who spoke out against Russia’s aggressive war on Ukraine.

yks Data Protection Department

Continue Reading

World

War in Ukraine: Olaf Scholz urgently warns against Russia’s use of nuclear weapons

Published

on

War in Ukraine: Olaf Scholz urgently warns against Russia’s use of nuclear weapons

Advisor Olaf Schulz The Social Democratic Party (SPD) says it wants to further strengthen international unity against Russia’s use of nuclear weapons in the Ukraine war. “It is always important to say loudly that nuclear weapons must not be used in this war,” Schulz said during a visit to Latvia. He added that this should be one of the clear messages in the peace conference scheduled to be held in Switzerland in mid-June.

Russian President Vladimir Putin had previously ordered his army to train on the use of tactical nuclear weapons. Forces near the border must also participate Ukraine To share. The Russian military leadership’s announcement did not mention exactly where and when the first military maneuver of this kind would be held since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The United States criticized the announced Russian nuclear maneuvers

The United States has Russia He was accused of „irresponsible speech” regarding the announced maneuver. Pat Ryder, a spokesman for the US Department of Defense, said that given the current security situation, such announcements were “completely inappropriate.” Meanwhile, there are currently no signs of changes “in Russian strategic strike force formations” and the United States continues to monitor the situation. John Kirby, spokesman for the US National Security Council, made a similar statement: “It is simply reckless and irresponsible for the leader of a major nuclear power to wave his sword the way he does regarding the potential use of nuclear weapons.” He looks at Putin.

In Riga, Schulz noted that China had also warned Russia against doing so in the past nuclear weapons For use in the war against Ukraine. Russia’s dependence on China has increased sharply in recent years as a result of Western sanctions, and two-way trade has expanded significantly since the beginning of the war.

READ  A man dies on a Ryanair flight - and his pregnant wife has to watch helplessly

Therefore, Chinese President Xi Jinping, who is currently on a state visit to Europe, is considered one of the few heads of state who can exert influence on Putin. French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also recently called on Xi to use this leverage. Put it in To convince them to end the war.

Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas also said that she should not be swayed by Russian nuclear threats. The aim of advertising is to spread fear. “That is why we should not give in to him,” Kalas said after the meeting with Schulz. Meanwhile, Callas stated that he could not completely rule out the possibility of Russia using nuclear weapons. She said Russia had „done all kinds of crazy things” in the past.

Schulz met with the heads of government of the three Baltic countries in Riga, Latvia. There he stressed the unity within NATO that Putin had sparked with his attack on Ukraine. During the visit, Schulz also backed EU plans to use revenues from frozen Russian state assets to finance arms purchases for Ukraine.

READ  Hunted by Trump supporters: Pence didn't want to flee the Capitol

Schultz wants to buy global weapons for quick delivery

The European Union Commission had already announced similar plans months ago. There are legal reservations regarding demands to completely confiscate about 200 billion euros of Russian state funds frozen in the European Union and hand them over to Ukraine. The Authority believes that the resulting interest income can be used without any legal problems. This is likely a low single digit billions per year.

Schulz demanded in Riga that 90% of this amount should be used to finance arms shipments to Ukraine. He also called for this money not to be used to purchase weapons only within the European Union, but rather in the entire global market. The Chancellor said: “What is actually important now is that weapons can be delivered quickly, and not for this to happen simply by building a new factory.”

At the same time, Schulz, together with the heads of government of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, called for expanding European arms production. He added that the matter has already begun in the field of ammunition and anti-aircraft systems.

The Czech Republic also buys ammunition for Ukraine

The European Union announced at the end of last year that it wanted to deliver one million artillery shells to Ukraine by spring. However, this goal was far from being achieved, which, in addition to the temporary interruption of arms shipments from the USA, led to a shortage of ammunition in the Ukrainian army and loss of territory.

Alternatively, the Czech Republic has been working for months to purchase up to 1.5 million doses from the global market for delivery to Ukraine. About 20 countries are helping to finance this initiative, including Germany with about 600 million euros. Deliveries should start in the summer at the latest.

READ  Ukraine wants to destroy Putin's entire fleet in the Black Sea

Follow all the current developments in Russia’s war against Ukraine on our live blog.

Continue Reading

Trending