Connect with us

World

NATO approves plans for a possible defensive war against Russia

Published

on

NATO approves plans for a possible defensive war against Russia

NATO countries have agreed on new plans to ward off possible Russian attacks on the alliance’s territory. The documents were accepted on Monday, a day before the start of the summit in Lithuania, in a written procedure, German news agency DPA and Reuters have learned from several diplomats. The decision will be confirmed again this Tuesday by the Heads of State and Government and then officially announced.

Defense Plans 4,000 pages

The Defense Plans, totaling more than 4,000 pages, describe in detail how sensitive sites in the coalition area should be protected by deterrence and defended in an emergency. For this purpose, the necessary military capabilities are identified. In addition to the Army, Air Force, and Navy, cyber and space capabilities are also included. „This is a direct result of Putin’s attack on Ukraine,” Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said recently in Brussels about working on the new plans. It is the first time in decades that there are new plans.

For decades, NATO saw no need for large-scale defense plans because it did not seem to designate Russia as an existential threat after the end of the Cold War. However, after the start of the war in Ukraine, there was pressure to revise all defense plans. However, an agreement has so far been blocked by Turkey due to the wording of geographical targets such as Cyprus.

Double duty for Germany

According to Pistorius, the plans task Germany with a double task. He explained that on the one hand, as it was during the Cold War, given its geographical location, it would be the logistical hub for the transportation of troops and materials. On the other hand, responsibility will be taken for the eastern flank and more deterrence and defense capacity will be provided there.

Just as the old Federal Republic lay exposed on the eastern side before 1989, Pistorius said, so the Baltic states are now. It is important that they now trust that allies will defend their freedom and security in an emergency.

Attacks by terrorist groups are also an issue

In addition to potential attacks by Russia, threats from terrorist groups are also the basis of the plans. The background is the experience of the al Qaeda terrorist network’s attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, as well as pressure from countries like Turkey, which has repeatedly had to deal with acts of terror by the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

READ  Corona is not defeated yet: the closure is back in these countries

The fact that NATO now has to make many changes is mainly due to the fact that the focus shifted from the Alliance’s defense to crisis management after the end of the Cold War. The main objective was to prepare well for operations in the Balkans or the Middle East.

New power structure

The plans will be implemented with the help of a new structure for the armed forces, among others. At last year’s NATO summit, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced that 300,000 troops should be kept on alert in preparation for a possible NATO deployment. To date, the NSF Intervention Force has been primarily aimed at NATO’s rapid crisis operations. Member states currently provide about 40,000 troops for this purpose.

Last year, Germany had already agreed to provide a contingent – that’s about 15,000 soldiers – for NATO’s new force structure. In addition, about 65 aircraft and 20 ships were promised as well as support forces and other units with special missions.

More deterrence through presence

The new defense plans envisage that units will generally remain stationed in their home countries, but will be assigned to specific countries and regions – for example on NATO’s eastern flank. If necessary, the troops are transferred to their areas to ensure their protection there. In particularly vulnerable areas, further deterrence through a permanent presence is planned. That is why Germany also wants to permanently station about 4,000 soldiers in Lithuania.

NATO territory is divided into three regions

Geographically, the NATO region has been divided into three planning regions: The first region extends from the United States across the Atlantic Ocean to Iceland, Great Britain, and Norway. The second includes Europe north of the Alps with Germany, Poland, and Central Eastern Europe including the Baltic states. The third extends across the Mediterranean and the Balkans to the Black Sea regions with countries such as Romania and Bulgaria.

READ  In Iran: Here is a singer learning his death sentence News

According to information from the alliance, the planning is primarily about defending against an attack of this magnitude on Ukraine. A number of areas have also been identified where Europe now needs to do more. According to the military, more heavy forces capable of withstanding fierce combat, more anti-aircraft systems, and more long-range artillery and missile systems are needed. It is also necessary to invest in information and data management systems as well as in logistics.

Targeting higher military spending

Among other things, to finance the goals, the military spending target will be raised at the summit meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday in Vilnius. Two percent of economic output should now be the minimum for military spending. Implementation of the plans is likely to take a few years for NATO representatives,

„We realized that we could indeed face an Article 5 situation again, where part of NATO’s territory is under direct attack,” a senior NATO official told dpa. And the Ukraine war showed that it can also be a large-scale offensive aimed at seizing part of NATO territory.

^ NATO, Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be deemed an attack against them all; They therefore agree that, in the event of such an armed attack, each of them, in the exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, shall render assistance to the party or parties attacked, […]

Selenskyj comes to Lithuania as a guest

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is expected to be a guest at the meeting in Vilnius. So far there has been no consensus in the military coalition to invite Ukraine to join Zelensky. The United States and the federal government believe that this is premature while the war continues. As a sign of rapprochement, a new NATO-Ukraine Council will be created, which is scheduled to meet with Zelensky for the first time. In addition, more military and security commitments are expected from NATO countries.

Erdogan is paving the way for Sweden to join NATO

On the eve of the summit, Türkiye dropped its opposition to Sweden joining NATO. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan agreed to refer the Swedish request to parliament. Thus, Türkiye has completed a turning point. Not long ago, Erdogan put a new obstacle to Sweden’s approval of NATO membership by calling on his country to move closer to the European Union. Turkey has so far blocked Sweden from joining NATO because the government in Ankara believes the northern country is not cooperating enough in fighting Kurdish extremists. On Monday, Stoltenberg made one final attempt at mediation before the summit. Sweden has been militarily neutral for a long time. But after Russia attacked Ukraine, that changed and the country, like Finland, applied for NATO membership.

READ  Why is Kiev's counteroffensive so complex and far from a failure?

Stoltenberg did not say when the Turkish parliament would ratify Sweden’s accession to NATO. Erdogan promised to do this as soon as possible. The consent of all NATO countries is required for membership. Finland was able to join in April. However, Sweden’s request was rejected by Türkiye and Hungary. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s chief of staff had already announced on Thursday that his country would no longer close the road to Sweden.

Erdogan calls for the resumption of accession talks with the European Union

Erdogan surprisingly made a new request before leaving for Vilnius. And making the resumption of EU accession talks with Turkey a condition for its approval of Sweden’s membership in NATO. „First, we open the way for Turkey to join the European Union, and then we open the way for Sweden,” Erdogan said.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) and the EU Commission reacted cautiously to the request and indicated that the two issues were unrelated. At the end of 2016, the European Union suspended accession negotiations with Turkey, which had begun in 2005. The background was the mass arrests of critics of the Turkish government after the failed military coup against President Erdogan in July 2016.

With information from the German news agency (DPA), Reuters and Agence France-Presse.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

Police disperse a Gaza protest camp on the UCLA campus

Published

on

Police disperse a Gaza protest camp on the UCLA campus

As of: May 2, 2024 at 9:18 p.m

Los Angeles police disperse a pro-Palestinian protest encampment on the UCLA campus. US President Biden has condemned the violence of the university occupiers – but does not want to call in the National Guard.

Protests over the Middle East war continue to simmer on American campuses. In many places, police units are deployed to evict pro-Palestinian activists occupying university buildings. There was also such an operation on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

Police cleared the tent camp there. The American CNN channel showed pictures of the remains of the camp at the site in the morning (local time). Officers had previously demolished the barriers that had been set up. According to the Associated Press news agency, at least 200 people were arrested during the evacuation.

Clashes at night

The authorities declared the camp on the University of California campus an “unlawful gathering” on Wednesday evening (local time). According to the Los Angeles Times, several thousand protesters gathered around the fortified tent camp and opposed emergency services, initially expelling them from the camp. Violence had already broken out the night before when supporters of the opposition side tried to demolish the protest camp themselves.

In recent weeks, many activists and students gathered at various American universities to demonstrate against Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip and in solidarity with the Palestinians. Mostly it is about demanding that universities and companies cut financial ties with Israel. While some Jewish students participate in these protests, others feel threatened and stay away from universities.

READ  Corona is not defeated yet: the closure is back in these countries

increase in Anti-Semitic procedures

Critics accuse the extremist part of the protest movement in particular of anti-Semitism and belittling Hamas. This denies Israel its right to exist, and on October 7, it carried out an unprecedented massacre against more than 1,200 Israelis who were living on the border with the Gaza Strip. Since then, the Tel Aviv government has been carrying out a large-scale military operation against the terrorist organization in the coastal region.

Anti-Semitic acts on campuses have increased since October 7, as have anti-Islamic attacks. In many places, pro-Palestinian activists are confronted by demonstrators showing their solidarity with the Israeli side and demanding the release of hostages still held by Hamas.

Biden: sabotage and Intimidation

US President Joe Biden explained during a speech at the White House that there is the right to protest, “but not the right to cause chaos.” There should also be no place on campus for anti-Semitism or threats of violence against Jewish students. This also applies to Islamophobia or discrimination against Arab Americans.

Biden stressed that acts of vandalism, trespassing on property, as well as “threatening and intimidating people” are not peaceful protests. The US President also made clear that the right to freedom of expression and peaceful protest is protected in the United States.

When asked by the press whether the National Guard should get involved, Biden said: “No.” The Democrat also explained that the protests did not cause him to rethink his Middle East policy. He also answered „no” to a journalist’s question.

Also popular at Dartmouth College

So far, more than 2,000 demonstrators have been arrested across the country. Before the UC campus was evacuated, there were police operations at other American universities: according to police in the city of Hanover, 90 people were arrested at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire on Wednesday evening (local time). They were charged with trespassing and resisting state authority after setting up tents at the site without permission.

READ  Consequences of Russia's losses in the Ukraine war

In Dallas, police clearing a protest camp on the University of Texas campus detained at least 20 people who were expected to spend the night in jail, Fox4 reported. Stony Brook University in New York also announced that the demonstration that began peacefully at its headquarters had subsided. Tents were set up and other students were intimidated and harassed. 29 demonstrators were subsequently arrested, including students, employees, and non-members of the university.

200 arrests at Columbia University

More than two weeks ago, the wave of protests on the campus of upscale Columbia University in New York began with a tent camp, and was quickly dispersed by police. This approach, which was seen as particularly harsh, prompted students to do so, leading to the formation of a larger camp. Tensions such that the largely peaceful protests eventually led to the violent occupation of Hamilton Hall on the Columbia University campus. A large NYPD squad then evacuated the campus and temporarily arrested more than 200 students.

Katarina Wilhelm, Tagesschau, May 2, 2024, 4:11 pm

Continue Reading

World

Ukraine launches 'Putin's nightmare' – long-range US missile hits Crimea

Published

on

Ukraine launches 'Putin's nightmare' – long-range US missile hits Crimea
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

First hit by a long-range US missile in Crimea: Ukraine uses Atakm again. There is cause for celebration, but it is very restricted.

Cape Tarkankot – “When thousands of shrapnel fall on an anti-aircraft battery, there is nothing left,” Thomas Thiener said last September. world Tell. The former Italian artilleryman commented on the potential impact of the Atakum (Army Tactical Missile Systems) missile with cluster munitions. It seems like something like this has happened again. Newsweek Reports, citing various sources, stated that Ukraine It is possible that Crimea has been attacked again with Atakum missiles, and perhaps even with cluster munitions again. Vladimir Putin An S-300 anti-aircraft battery was now lost in the final attack. There is also talk of launching a strike against Russian positions in occupied southeastern Ukraine Daily news This is done using Atacms.

A tempting war target: The Crimean Bridge has been attacked repeatedly — as happened here in October 2022. With new Atakum missiles, Ukraine could seriously damage the bridge and perhaps cut off Russian supplies entirely. © Uncredited/AP/dpa

Newsweek It refers to Channel Newsweek Very cheerful. As happened last fall, when Ukraine dealt a strong blow to the Russian Air Force for the first time; Until the New Zurich Times The topic lit up: “Blistering flames, huge clouds of smoke, and the outline of a combat helicopter against the red night sky: video images of inferno at the military airport in the Russian-occupied city of Berdyansk on October 17, 2023.” He immediately made it clear that the Russian Air Force had suffered a serious blow. It was soon confirmed that a new weapon was being used here: Ukraine fired American Atakum missiles for the first time.

„Putin's Nightmare”: The modern Ataxus symbolizes the principle of hope in Ukraine

Meanwhile, US President Joe Biden I paid for the supply of this weapon. Ukraine will be able to travel long distances because the United States has delivered the current type with a range of up to 300 kilometers. The headline read: “With this weapon, Putin’s nightmare has come true.” world In September, when the first batch of missiles, the older type with a range of less than 200 kilometers, had probably just arrived at the front. It symbolizes the principle of hope, which the defenders of Russian terrorism seem to be using at every straw they have, because the situation in Ukraine is like a nightmare. Even if a battery in the Crimea were destroyed, it would be a drop in the ocean, even though it is world “All Russian facilities are in grave danger,” she responded again animatedly, wanting to know.

READ  In Iran: Here is a singer learning his death sentence News

Online time It's more realistic – if not downright pessimistic: from their point of view, this would be the right weapon – but a year too late: „There is more promise in the missile than it can deliver,” wrote author Alexander Edlin. In fact, the number of Atacms delivered appears to be unclear. The first batch last fall described this Daily news As a “very small number”, it is now reported time according to The New York Times An additional 100 missiles were delivered – their advantage is that they can be launched from HIMARS missile launchers already in use in Ukraine.

Impact in Crimea: There is no tactical value without the use of ground forces

Meanwhile, the US has also reportedly delivered the modernized version with a range of up to 300 km and GPS, perhaps due to Russia's now significant superiority. This certainly gives Ukraine operational opportunities, but on the other hand, this is also an argument Institute for the Study of War (ISW) Caution: With Ukraine's ability to operate over longer distances, it is simply pushing Russian airfields, warehouses, or staging areas into the heart of Russia: a missile attack without follow-up ground forces will therefore not achieve long-term tactical success. .

Even the current attack on the air defenses in Crimea may be a successful event, but it is certainly unique – in contrast to the ongoing drone-assisted attack on the Black Sea Fleet, which has established Ukraine as a regional naval power. But what is more threatening is the war of attrition that Ukraine has been waging with increasing force for months, behind the lines of contact. Attrition is likely to increase with the new delivery of precision American Atakam missiles with a range of up to 300 kilometers. world He was drafted blue late last year. There are still few signs of that.

READ  Tirade to judges: Trump delivers angry speech in court

Time is ticking for Russia, but the clock may be ticking for the Crimean Bridge

The big bang may already be imminent. The Crimean Bridge remains a thorn in the side of Ukraine, which would become more vulnerable again with new missiles. But it is questionable how many missiles Ukraine would have to invest in order to cut off the lifeline of Russian supplies. At least Russia had time to use the months of wrangling the United States has witnessed to prepare itself. Since the successful attack by Ukraine in October, the Russians have had the opportunity to prepare for this threat ISW He writes. The Russians could have moved their warehouses back and better protected them against air raids.

The West remains somewhat concerned about the use of the weapon and Moscow's response in the event of an ATACM strike to the heart of Russia. Weapons are expressly intended for such “use within its territory.” Daily news Quoted by Jake Sullivan, the President's National Security Advisor. Currently – on April 28 – the news agency reported Reuters Based on renewed demand from Ukraine to the USA. In his weekly video address, President Volodymyr Zelensky said he recently spoke with US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and asked him to hurry up: “In my conversation with Mr. Jeffries, I stressed the need for Patriot systems, and as quickly as possible.” „.

Cutting supplies: Ukraine's chance to stabilize the front

Reuters At the same time, reports indicate that the situation on the front in Ukraine is deteriorating: since the capture of the city of Avdiivka, Moscow's forces have been advancing slowly, taking advantage of the defenders' lack of artillery and soldiers. The Kiev forces were to take up new positions west of the villages of Berdykhi and Semenivka, both north of Avdiivka, and Novomikhylivka, south near the town of Marinka. “In general, the enemy achieved certain tactical successes in these areas, but was unable to achieve operational advantages,” Laut said. Reuters Colonel-General Oleksandr Sersky, Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

READ  Ukraine war: dissident Oleksiy Kovalov shot dead | Policy

In March, the most famous German military historian Sönke Neitzel said NDR He joked that he was almost accused of defeatism at the recent Munich security conference when he said he would be happy if at least Ukraine didn't lose. Neitzel repeatedly stresses the need to increase Ukraine's ability to attack. According to him, optimism is spread primarily by those who have no idea “how difficult it is to carry out offensive operations,” he said. Atacms can contribute to offensive capability. It seems so too MirrorAuthor Gernot Kramber said he feared the Ukrainians would not be able to withstand Russian pressure much longer.

If it now becomes possible to cut off Russian supplies and strike command structures, Russian offensive momentum will weaken. “This does not mean victory, but the Ukrainians will at least have a chance to stabilize their front.” (priest)

Continue Reading

World

It is clear that Hamas leaders view the Israeli proposal with suspicion

Published

on

It is clear that Hamas leaders view the Israeli proposal with suspicion

As of: May 2, 2024 at 7:39 AM

In the struggle for a ceasefire in the Middle East, an official response by Hamas to Israeli concessions is still pending. However, the Jemaah Islamiyah leader has already spoken – and he did not sound optimistic.

According to a media report, the leader of the extremist Islamic movement Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Juhia Sinwar, is questioning the latest offer to negotiate a hostage deal.

A source close to the Hamas leader told the Israeli television channel Channel 12 this evening that this is not an offer from Egyptian mediators, but rather an Israeli offer “in American guise” that includes a number of pitfalls. The current draft does not contain any guarantee that the war will end.

It is unclear how many hostages are still alive

As part of Egyptian mediation efforts in Cairo, Hamas was presented with a ceasefire proposal in exchange for the release of the hostages. The Egyptian mediators had previously received the offer in Israel.

In the October 7 massacre in Israel, Hamas and other terrorist groups took more than 250 hostages. 105 of them were released at the end of November. It is unclear how many of the rest are still alive.

An official response from Hamas is expected soon

Hamas has not yet responded to the Israeli proposal. The Islamic organization so far insists on ending the war, which Israel rejects. The Israeli government announced the rapid start of the controversial offensive in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on the border with Egypt if an agreement is not reached.

READ  Medicines for Israeli hostages arrive in Gaza

Hamas's representative in Lebanon, Osama Hamdan, told Al-Manar TV station, which is controlled by the pro-Iranian Shiite Hezbollah militia in Lebanon: “Our position on the current negotiating document is negative,” as The Times of Israel reported that night. But according to the Hamas press office, this does not mean an interruption in the negotiations. According to the newspaper, the organization intends to provide a response to the latest proposal within the next few hours.

What weight does the word sinwar carry?

A person close to Sinwar told Israel's Channel 12 that statements by Hamas leaders in exile should not be viewed as official positions of the Islamic organization. The Gaza leader now relies solely on two of his close followers who control the Gaza Strip for decision-making. He left the matter before the terrorist attack launched by Hamas on Israel on October 7 last year.

According to The Times of Israel, Hamas leaders in exile recently issued statements in favor of a ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip.

Map of the Gaza Strip, gray areas: built-up areas of the Gaza Strip, inscribed: areas controlled by the Israeli army

Blinken: “Hamas is blocking the way to a ceasefire”

During his visit to Israel, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken previously called on Hamas to agree to the Israeli ceasefire proposal. He said, „It is Hamas that is blocking the path to a ceasefire.” There is a „very strong suggestion on the table” that the terrorist organization should „agree to it and get it over with.”

According to media reports, the Israeli proposal stipulates a multi-stage process in which fighting in the Gaza Strip would be halted for 40 days initially, and the hostages would be released in return. First, women, the sick, the elderly and the wounded must be released. As was the case with the first ceasefire, Palestinian prisoners will also be released from Israeli prisons – also in stages.

READ  If there was an extra charge for crepes, the locals would now be weary

An Israeli government spokesman said it wanted to wait until the evening to get a response from Hamas. A “decision” will then be made on whether Israel will send a delegation to Cairo for further talks.

Continue Reading

Trending