Connect with us

World

Withdrawal of forces despite NATO concerns: Russia exposes its external borders

Published

on

Withdrawal of forces despite NATO concerns: Russia exposes its external borders

Russia has deployed thousands of soldiers in neighboring countries and along important borders for decades. But the Ukraine war has exhausted divisions in strategically important locations because President Vladimir Putin needs as many soldiers as possible in Ukraine.

In the far north, Russia shares a border with NATO member Norway. It is less than 200 kilometers long, but it remains geopolitically explosive, especially since the Kremlin forces invaded Ukraine.

But due to the need for as many soldiers as possible in Ukraine, Russia has now almost completely withdrawn its military forces from the border with Norway. Norwegian Chief of General Staff Erik Christophersen said last week that only a maximum of 20% of the soldiers who were stationed here before the war in Ukraine were still at the site.

Kristofferson is convinced that the decision to regroup forces shows primarily that Putin does not actually see any threat in NATO. “If he thought we were a threat to Russia, he would not have sent his troops to war in Ukraine.”

“Russia knows that NATO does not pose a threat.”

NATO Military Committee Chairman Admiral Rob Bauer added that the same applies to the 1,300-kilometre-long border with Finland. „Russia knows that NATO does not pose a threat because we have no intention of attacking them. Otherwise, they would have reacted completely differently to Finland joining NATO,” he added.

In April this year, Moscow initially announced an increase in its military presence near the border. But nothing happened; Instead, Putin’s forces appear to need every available soldier in Ukraine.

This also applies to military units in Kaliningrad. The region is located between Poland, Lithuania and Belarus on the Baltic Sea. The Russian enclave has been an important military outpost for Moscow for decades. Russia has now significantly reduced the number of its troops here as well – the reason is the shortage of soldiers on the front in Ukraine.

READ  Police Kill Suspect - Gunman Shoots Five in Denver - News Abroad

Fewer soldiers in separatist areas

Russia’s military presence in Georgia’s separatist regions has also decreased. Moscow has considered the self-declared Republic of South Ossetia to be an independent state since 2008. As a result, Russia has deployed soldiers in the region that broke away from Georgia. However, there are now reports from Georgia that there is almost no military presence anymore. He added: „If we were monitoring the bases currently, we could clearly see that there were very few individuals stationed there.” “Lasha Beridze said on Euronews. The colonel of the Georgian Army Reserve assumes that Russia has given priority to sending soldiers to the front in Ukraine.

This also applies to the second breakaway region on Georgian territory. Since the Georgia War in 2008, Russia has deployed about 1,300 soldiers in Abkhazia. But it also appears that the Russian Armed Forces have reduced the number of their forces in this breakaway region, as a European Union monitoring mission in Georgia recently reported. “They also transferred a lot of technology,” mission commander Dimitrios Karaballis said in August.

Uncertainty about Belarus

Belarus is a special case. According to Ukrainian information, the number of Kremlin forces in the country belonging to Putin’s loyal ally Alexander Lukashenko has also decreased recently. Kyiv announced this in the summer Almost all Russian forces withdrew from Belarus He was.

However, in mid-August, several hundred soldiers arrived in the neighboring country again to participate in a major military exercise conducted by the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in September. According to opposition media in Belarus, about 2,000 Russian soldiers reside in four military bases in the country.

But at the beginning of this month, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu suddenly announced that the planned Zapad exercises would be canceled this year, and that „the exercises will take place in Ukraine instead.” The British Ministry of Defense had already anticipated this move in advance because the Russians had very few forces at their disposal.

READ  21 agents gather for a boat trip

Tajikistan is no longer a buffer zone?

In another former Soviet country, Russia is no longer the strong player it was in recent days. Moscow has played an important role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan for decades, and has deployed so-called peacekeeping forces in Armenia since 2020. Stefan Mallerius, who heads the “Regional Program for Political Dialogue in the South Caucasus” of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, said in an interview. Recently: “It is clear that the Kremlin has been the protecting power of Armenia for more than 30 years, and now Putin is working with Azerbaijan.” ntv.de. It is unclear what will happen to Moscow’s approximately 2,000 soldiers in Armenia in the medium term.

Russia has also lost its power potential in Tajikistan. About 7,000 soldiers were originally stationed in the Central Asian country because the Kremlin considers Tajikistan a buffer zone against Afghanistan in the south. The base is one of the largest outside Russia. However, I already mentioned it last summer „Radio Free Europe”Russia withdrew just over 2,000 soldiers and sent them to Ukraine. It is not known whether there have been further troop transfers since then.

Putin also ordered the withdrawal of some of his forces from neighboring Kyrgyzstan. It is estimated that up to 500 Russian soldiers are stationed here. Most of them came from the Republic of Tuva in southern Siberia, one of the poorest regions in Russia. Search by „Radio Free Europe” They show that „at least 90 Tuvan soldiers” were first taken to the military base in Kant in Kyrgyzstan and from there sent to Ukraine – „against their will.”

READ  Florida man: The New York Post mocks Donald Trump

Withdrawal of military equipment from the Pacific island

The extent of Russia’s regrouping is also demonstrated by the transfer of military equipment. Moscow recently withdrew air defense systems from the strategically important Kuril Islands, an archipelago north of Japan claimed equally by Russia and Japan. This is shown through satellite images evaluated by Japanese political scientist Yu Koizumi.

In 2020, the Russian military deployed several systems on the 1,200-kilometre-long island chain. It is suspected that Russia now needs S-300 air defense systems in the west of the country to protect itself from Ukrainian air attacks.

In addition, military equipment is also said to have disappeared from the North Pacific island of Sakhalin, as satellite images also show. Old Soviet tanks and howitzers were stationed here until recently, but now, according to Japanese reports, they are said to be repaired and maintained in surrounding factories. Tanks and howitzers are likely to be used in Ukraine as well.

„I Learned Something Again” Podcast.

“I Learned Something Again” is a podcast for those who are curious: Why might the ceasefire be just a break for Vladimir Putin? Why does NATO fear the Suwalki gap? Why does Russia have iPhones again? What small behavioral changes can save 15 percent energy? Listen and be smarter three times a week.

You can find all episodes in the NTV app RTL+, Apple Podcast And Spotify. „Something Learned Again” is also included. Amazon Music And Google Podcast available. For all other podcast apps, you can use the RSS feed.

do you have a question? Please email us at [email protected]

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

NATO says the Russian Kharkiv attack may fail

Published

on

NATO says the Russian Kharkiv attack may fail
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

Despite heavy losses in the Ukraine war: Russia is sticking to its attack on Kharkiv. But NATO does not believe in the possibility of achieving a breakthrough on the front.

Kharkiv – With tanks, drones and tens of thousands of soldiers: The Russian army has been bombing the Kharkiv region for weeks in its aggressive war on Ukraine. Attackers also specifically exploit some weaknesses in defenses. However, Western military observers do not currently expect Putin’s forces to march through Ukraine’s second-largest city. NATO confirmed this.

Kharkiv offensive in the Ukrainian war: NATO doubts the Russian army’s ability to penetrate it

The Commander-in-Chief of NATO forces in Europe, Christopher Cavoli, said, according to what the news agency reported, “The Russians do not have the military power necessary to achieve a strategic breakthrough.” dpa. Russia with Kharkiv attack He added that they are capable of achieving local successes – and “that is what they did.” But heavy losses were also suffered at the front in the Ukrainian war. But more cannot be expected. Because the Russian army lacks the “skills and ability” to do so, according to the military expert.

The Kharkiv offensive continues in the Ukrainian war. Kyiv defends itself against Russian attacks. But there are always air alarms. (Archive photo) © Kostiantyn Liberov/AP/dpa

Despite losses in the Ukraine war: Russian forces have made some gains in the territories near Kharkiv

In the ongoing aggressive war against Ukraine for more than two years, Russia has recently increasingly targeted the area around the city of Kharkiv. Last March, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s forces massed more than 30,000 troops in the east of the country and launched an offensive. Several villages were captured and the defenders had to evacuate other communities. Although he suffered Russia is still suffering heavy losses. However, ground gains have increased in recent days as the attackers faced poorly fortified defenses – a circumstance that Putin’s forces appear to have deliberately sought to exploit.

READ  Putin threatens the West: We will offer nothing! Policy

Ukraine War: Map showing the current front line

In fact, the Ukrainian defense lines on this part of the front against a possible Kharkiv attack were rather weak. This was brought by the British guardian. The newspaper quoted Ukrainian commander Denis Yaroslavsky as saying that in Vovchansk, less than 65 kilometers northwest of Kharkiv, “there was simply no first line of defense and no mines.” In addition, the Ukrainian units in this area were not combat ready.

Air alert in Kharkiv: Zelensky describes the situation on the front as “difficult”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky admitted after a meeting of the War Cabinet that the situation in the Kharkiv region is “very difficult.” He had previously traveled near the New Front on Thursday (16 May) and consulted with his military officers there. Shortly after that, the weather alert for the eastern regions of Ukraine began. The Russian army bombed the city of Kharkiv with drones for more than 16 hours. This was one of the longest air raid warnings since the beginning of Russia’s war of aggression. However, the situation is “under control,” Zelensky promised.

The defenders now hope to obtain supplies of weapons. After more than two years of fighting, ammunition supplies have been exhausted in recent months. But the US Congress recently approved the delivery of new arms shipments to Ukraine. Large quantities of ammunition, short-range air defense systems and new armored vehicles are now scheduled to be brought to the front. (jkf)

Continue Reading

World

Israel: Netanyahu must present a plan – otherwise Minister Gantz will threaten to withdraw from the government

Published

on

Israel: Netanyahu must present a plan – otherwise Minister Gantz will threaten to withdraw from the government
outside Final warning in Israel

Netanyahu must present a plan, otherwise Minister Gantz will threaten to withdraw from the government

Massive protests against Netanyahu in Israel again

Massive demonstrations took place again against Prime Minister Netanyahu in Israel. The demonstrators accuse the government of abandoning Hamas hostages. Meanwhile, Benny Gantz, a minister in the Israeli war cabinet, threatened to resign from the government.

Benny Gantz called on Prime Minister Netanyahu to present a plan for the post-war order in the Gaza Strip by June 8. If Gantz carries out his threat, it could have far-reaching consequences for the Israeli government.

BEni Gantz, a minister in the Israeli war cabinet, threatened to resign from the government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The politician said Saturday evening in Tel Aviv that if the prime minister does not present a plan for the post-war regime in the Gaza Strip by June 8, he and other members of the National Union Party will leave the government.

Among other things, Gantz called for the establishment of an alternative American-European-Arab-Palestinian government in the Gaza Strip, which under no circumstances could be Hamas or Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. In addition, hostages from Gaza must be returned and relations with Saudi Arabia must be normalized. Gantz also called for adopting the concept of military service for all Israelis. “Prime Minister Netanyahu, I look you in the eye this evening and say – the choice is in your hands.”

Read also

The 64-year-old politician joined Netanyahu’s government as a minister without portfolio and a member of the war cabinet after the unprecedented attack by Hamas and other terrorist groups on October 7. In doing so, the participants wanted to send a signal of unity. The centrist party, the National Union, led by Gantz, stands in opposition. Opinion polls indicate that she is currently ahead by a large margin over the Likud Party led by Netanyahu.

Read also

One demonstrator shows an upside-down triangle with her fingers.  Hamas and its followers use an inverted red triangle to identify terrorist targets

Netanyahu’s office said that Gantz’s demands would mean a defeat for Israel, the handover of the majority of hostages, Hamas remaining in power, and the establishment of a Palestinian state, according to media reports. Netanyahu believes that forming an emergency government is important to achieve all the goals of the war, including the return of all hostages.

Brexit could lead to a government crisis

Israel is under international criticism due to the large number of civilian casualties and the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip. Many in the country complain that the war has not achieved a decisive victory, even after more than seven months. The fact that more than 100 hostages are still in the hands of Hamas also raises criticism of the government.

Read also

Jean-Luc Mélenchon at an anti-Israel demonstration in Geneva

Netanyahu has been in power since the end of 2022 alongside the far-right and extremist religious parties. He has so far refused to present a plan for the management and reconstruction of the Gaza Strip after the end of the war so as not to offend his partners in the far-right coalition.

Here you will find content from third parties

In order to view embedded content, it is necessary to obtain your revocable consent to the transfer and processing of personal data, as providers of embedded content require this consent as third-party service providers. [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to „On”, you agree to this (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Article 49(1)(a) of the GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can revoke your consent at any time using the key and privacy at the bottom of the page.

They are pursuing unrealistic goals such as building Jewish settlements in Gaza, but Netanyahu’s political survival depends on them. If Gantz carries out his threat and leaves the government, this could spark a government crisis.

READ  Lavrov's spokeswoman accuses the European Union of mistreating Ukrainian children
Continue Reading

World

Donald Trump demands Joe Biden take a drug test before debate

Published

on

Donald Trump demands Joe Biden take a drug test before debate

The two alleged contenders for the position of US President agreed on a date for a television debate. Now Trump is making a new request.

Former US President Donald Trump called on current President Joe Biden to submit to a drug test before their duel on Monday in a television debate for the first time during the election campaign at the end of June. „I don’t want him to get there like he did in the State of the Union address,” Trump said during a Republican Party event in St. Paul, Minnesota. „He was as high as a kite.”

Trump has previously indicated several times in interviews that the US President was under the influence of substances on various occasions. He previously made similar accusations against his rival, Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 election campaign. Trump has not yet provided any evidence for his allegations. Biden has not yet commented on Trump’s allegations.

Ahead of the US presidential election in November, President Joe Biden and his rival Donald Trump want to compete against each other in two televised debates. Biden challenged Trump to two televised duels on Wednesday, and he immediately accepted the challenge. The American CNN network said that the first debate will take place on June 27 in Atlanta, Georgia. The two competitors also agreed on a second date on September 10.

READ  21 agents gather for a boat trip
Continue Reading

Trending