Connect with us

World

Big losses for Russia – Putin critic considers Bakhmut’s invasion 'meaningless’

Published

on

Big losses for Russia – Putin critic considers Bakhmut’s invasion 'meaningless’
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

creature:

from: Christina Dink

Russia announced its seizure of the city of Bakhmut. The criticism comes from within their ranks. Putin critic Igor Girkin deplores the heavy losses and calls the invasion a waste of time.

Bakhmut/Moscow – For months, the Ukrainian army and Russian soldiers, as well as the Wagner Group, have been facing each other in Bakhmut. The battle is considered the bloodiest and longest war in Ukraine. Now the city was controlled by the Wagner Group, at least according to Russian sources. But at what cost? A Russian critic thinks the train is pointless. He knows battle losses.

Bashmut: Putin Critic Thinks Invasion Pointless – 'Wasted Time’

“Bashmut has been brought home,” Putin critic Igor Girkin wrote via Telegram. „This does not excite me, given the losses, wasted resources, wasted time and an initial understanding of the strategic futility of this operation.”

Girkin also wrote about the battles of South Bakhmut for Avdiivka, Marinka and Ogildar that it was not a victory, but a bloodbath. The newspaper quoted the newspaper as saying that „the blood of those who planned and led the attacks is unfortunately not from the headquarters, but rather” the soldiers and officers of the front, the mobilizers and the volunteers. Newsweek Jerkin statement.

Losses in the Ukraine war Confirmed US allegations the other party’s estimates
Ukraine 15500 – 17500
Russia 35,500 – 43,000 more than 200,000 (Ukraine estimate)

Girkin is a former military commander in Donetsk. He rose to prominence during the annexation of Crimea and became one of the leading voices of Russian nationalists. He supports the war, but is highly critical of the Russian military leadership and the stagnation of the planned invasion of Ukraine. a „Bloody circus with clowns in military uniform” is the war for Ukrainehe complained in April.

READ  Vaccination and booster against corona: for whom, who, when and where? | NDR.de - News

Battles of Bakhmut: conquest or not?

For months there was fighting around the town of Bakhmut. latest news in Recently, Bashmut has pointed more towards the Ukrainian invasion. Only on Friday, May 19, did Ukraine claim to have gained ground in counterattacks around the completely destroyed city. In response, Russia has sent additional forces to the front in recent days, the Ministry of Defense in London said.

It is said that the Wagner group captured the city of Bashmut. A Putin critic says the train is „strategically useless” © Concord Group Press Office / Imago

On the morning of Sunday, May 21, Prigozhin, commander of Wagner’s forces, announced the capture of the city, which was confirmed by the Russian Ministry of Defense. “Today Bakhmut is only in our hearts,” said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Sunday, and there was “nothing” left. Whether Selenskyj meant the destruction of the city or a possible conquest remained open at first. A few hours later, a spokesman for the president denied that Zelensky had confirmed any loss to Bakhmut.

Apparent Bashmut Conquest: It should only have symbolic value

But is it conquest or not? What is the significance of the city in eastern Ukraine? The importance of the small town has been debated for months—not just by Putin’s critic Gherkin. At first, the invasion seemed to open the way inland for Russia. Bakhmut is located near a highway that leads to the major Ukrainian-controlled cities of Kramatorsk and Sloviansk. Meanwhile, neighboring cities of Liman and Izyum were recaptured by Ukraine.

It is therefore likely that Bakhmut’s conquest had primarily symbolic meaning for both sides. After last year’s spring offensive, Russia can once again claim victory. So did Ukraine, whose last major regional success came in November 2022 when it recaptured the city of Chersonesos. It is also questionable whether the capture of Bakhmut would have an effect on the expected spring offensive in Ukraine. guessing no. Because there was always speculation that Kiev was testing the ability of the Russian forces to defend themselves in later battles at Bakhmut. Meanwhile, experts are baffling over the planned counteroffensive in Ukraine: has it really begun? (chd/dpa/AFP)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

World

War | Belgorod: Ukraine bombs a Russian city

Published

on

War |  Belgorod: Ukraine bombs a Russian city

Ukraine bombs targets in Russia. Poland arrests a Russian soldier on the border. All information in the news blog.

The most important things at a glance


download…

inclusion

Parliament in Kyiv approves the use of prisoners on the front

6:02 AM: The Ukrainian parliament approved a bill allowing the deployment of prisoners to the front. As MP Olena Shuljak announced on Facebook, deputies in Kiev voted in favor of the project in the second reading with 279 yes votes.

In exchange for amnesty, this allows imprisoned criminals to be deployed in the ranks of the Ukrainian armed forces on the front. According to Shuljak, this should only happen on a voluntary basis. In addition, those affected may have less than three years of imprisonment remaining. Dangerous criminals imprisoned for multiple murders, rapes or attacks on national security are not given the opportunity.

Deputy Shuliak emphasizes that before the operation is performed, the physical and mental condition of the prisoners is also examined. Before the law enters into force, it must be signed by the Speaker of Parliament and the President of the Republic.

Ukraine bombs Russian targets – fires and casualties

5:48 AM: According to Russian sources, a Ukrainian drone attack caused a fire in a refinery in the Russian Krasnodar region. The regional administration said via the short message service „Telegram” that about six drones were shot down, but the debris fell on the refinery near the village of Yurovka and led to a fire. Several tanks were damaged.

Great Britain wants to expel the Russian military attaché

8:38 pm: Britain announced the imminent expulsion of the Russian military attaché. In fact, he is a „little-known military intelligence officer,” Home Secretary James Cleverley said in Parliament in London. A military attaché is a member of the armed forces who serves in an embassy and represents his country’s defense sector abroad.

Cleverley also announced that several Russian properties on British soil that London suspected were being used for „intelligence purposes” would lose their diplomatic status. Cleverly also reveals “new restrictions on Russian diplomatic visas”, in particular limiting the amount of time Russian diplomats can spend in the UK. The Russian ambassador was summoned and informed of the procedures.

Russia rejects the accusations against military attaché Maxim Ilovik and criticizes the loss of diplomatic status for Russian properties. „London decided to justify its anti-Russian measures with lies,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in Moscow. It announced a „strong response” from Russia without going into details.

GPS interference: Estonia appoints Russian charge d’affaires

7:23 pm: Estonia has summoned the Chargé d’Affaires of the Russian Embassy in Tallinn due to a disruption in GPS satellite navigation in the Baltic Sea region. Foreign Minister Margos Tsahkna said in Tallinn that so-called jamming – that is, active disruption of the signal – by Russia is becoming increasingly common. This causes confusion and has a major impact on civil aviation. Aircraft use a Global Positioning System (GPS) signal to determine their location and for navigation.

Continue Reading

World

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?

Published

on

Why are the leading candidates of the Austrian Green Party criticized?
[–>

Der Beginn des Europawahlkampfs der österreichischen Grünen ist von Turbulenzen um Spitzenkandidatin Lena Schilling überlagert worden. Am Mittwoch erschien in der österreichischen Zeitung „Der Standard“ ein Bericht, in dem Schilling zwar keine rechtlichen – oder im engeren Sinne politischen – Vorwürfe gemacht werden, aber in dem ein äußerst ungünstiges Charakterbild gezeichnet wird.

[–>

Die Grünen sahen sich veranlasst, am Mittwoch kurzfristig eine Pressekonferenz einzuberufen, auf der sich die Parteispitze mit markigen Worten hinter ihre Europa-Spitzenkandidatin stellt. Der Grünen-Vorsitzende und Vizekanzler Werner Kogler sprach von einem „anonymen Gemurkse“ und „Gefurze“, durch das man sich nicht beeindrucken lassen werde.

[–>

Anlass der Berichterstattung ist eine gerichtliche Unterlassungserklärung, mit der sich Schilling verpflichtet, bestimmte Behauptungen über Personen aus ihrem privaten Umfeld nicht mehr zu verbreiten. Daran anknüpfend zitiert die Zeitung mehrere anonyme Gesprächspartner in einer Weise, die es nahelegt, dass die junge politische Quereinsteigerin – bekanntgeworden als Klimaaktivistin – häufiger falsche abträgliche Behauptungen über andere Personen in die Welt setze. Schilling mochte sich in der Sache nicht äußern, da es sich um ihr Privatleben handle. Es werde gegen sie mit Gerüchten und Unterstellungen „kampagnisiert“.

[–>[–>

Zeitung kritisiert Reaktion des Parteivorsitzenden

[–>

Die Chefredaktion des linksliberalen Blattes rügte ihrerseits, dass der Grünen-Vorsitzende journalistische Arbeit als „Gefurze“ bezeichne. Man könne jede behauptete Einzelheit belegen. Veröffentlicht wurde – bei geschwärzten Namen – die Unterlassungserklärung. In dem Artikel wird ausführlich begründet, warum man sich entschlossen habe, in dieser Weise über Dinge zu berichten, die die Privatsphäre berühren. Schilling sei Spitzenkandidatin, werde wahrscheinlich ins Europaparlament einziehen und könnte dort die österreichische Grünen-Delegation anführen. Daher sei sie eine Person öffentlichen Interesses, und es sei relevant, wie sie sich gegenüber Kollegen und auch Medien verhalte.

READ  EU corruption scandal: Qatar responded to the allegations with blunt threats

[–>

In einem Fall geht es darum, dass sie einem Journalisten sexuelle Belästigung vorgeworfen haben soll. Der Mann sei von einer Kündigung bedroht gewesen, doch habe eine Untersuchung durch seinen Arbeitgeber keine Hinweise darauf ergeben, dass an dem Vorwurf etwas dran sei.

[–>[–>

Die Grünen sprachen hingegen von einer „organisierten Kampagne“. Die Fraktionsvorsitzende Sigrid Maurer meinte, das sei auch direkt gegen junge Frauen gerichtet. Klimaschutzministerin Leonore Gewessler bezeichnete die Vorwürfe als „hemmungslos“. Schilling selbst äußerte, dass sie lieber über politische Inhalte diskutieren wolle, nämlich den Klimaschutz.

Continue Reading

World

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense? Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power

Published

on

Destroying the Crimean Bridge makes no sense?  Warning of Ukraine’s attacks on Putin’s symbol of power
  1. Homepage
  2. Policy

He presses

The Crimean Bridge is a symbol of power for Putin – and a tempting target for Ukraine. But a Ukrainian intelligence expert recommends a different strategy in the war.

Kiev – The Russian regime warned of a „devastating retaliatory strike” if Ukraine attacks the Russian-annexed Crimea peninsula or the Crimean bridgehead again. The reason: There is speculation in Russia that Ukraine may be planning a major attack – on the occasion of “Victory Day,” which Russia marks on May 9 with an exhibition of captured military equipment. A simultaneous attack on the bridge connecting the peninsula to mainland Russia, It would be humiliating Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This was announced by a Ukrainian military intelligence officer in the British newspaper in April Watchman To: “We will destroy the bridge in the first half of 2024” The destruction of the bridge, which has already been attacked twice, is “inevitable.”

Now a Ukrainian intelligence expert is explicitly warning against destroying the Crimean Bridge. This is not out of fear of Putin’s revenge, but because he considers this a waste of Ukraine’s already scarce military resources.

A tempting war target: the Crimean Bridge has been attacked repeatedly – ​​as happened here in October 2022. © Uncredited/AP/dpa

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” Warning against wrong tactics in the Ukraine war

“What will the destruction of the Crimean Bridge bring us?” asks Ivan Stupak, a former employee of the Ukrainian Internal Intelligence Service. Interview with Ukrainian News Agency Union. Destroying the Crimean Bridge will be complex and difficult. The bridge was repeatedly damaged in previous attacks, but has since been restored. „It’s not doing well.”

READ  War in the Middle East: Germany stops funding UNRWA in the Gaza Strip

Stupak believes that future attempts to destroy the bridge would be a waste of energy. Especially since Russia has now responded: it is clear that Putin’s army is no longer using the bridge for military purposes.

A Ukrainian open source agency recently found using satellite images that far fewer trains pass through the Kerch Bridge than in the past. Instead, Russia is now increasingly using land routes into the annexed areas of eastern Ukraine to supply the front lines of the Ukrainian war.

The head of Ukrainian domestic intelligence, Wasyl Malik, said in March 2024 that Russia would no longer use the Crimean bridge to deliver weapons. Trains that passed the bridge now transport only people and consumer goods.

The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war.
The Kerch Bridge, which connects the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, was damaged several times during the Ukraine war. © Konstantin Mihalchevsky/Imago

In the war against Russia, Ukraine should attack other targets instead of the Crimean bridgehead

Ukrainian military expert Stupak recommends in an interview with Union Therefore, no more missiles and ammunition are wasted on attacks on the Kerch Bridge. Instead, the Ukrainian military should attack Russian targets whose destruction would be of greater benefit. Stupak cites „headquarters and depots” as examples, as well as air defense complexes, aircraft and airfields.

For example, if Ukraine destroyed a Russian S300 anti-aircraft missile complex, this would directly help Ukrainian defense: Russia could then immediately shoot down fewer Ukrainian planes and drop fewer missiles on soldiers, “meaning we don’t lose.” Any military or military forces.” Civilians. This is a great added value. This is also a direct effect.” Because they meant to “destroy Putin’s money.”

Experts recommend launching attacks on Russian fighter planes instead of the Crimean bridge

The Ukrainian expert said that the most important thing for Ukrainian defense in the war against Russia is the destruction of Russian fighter planes carrying high-explosive glide bombs. As a result of Russia’s use of so-called FAB bombs, the Ukrainian city of Avdiivka fell, which could now be repeated in the currently besieged city of Chasiv Yar.

The military expert warns that FAF glide bombs will penetrate Ukrainian defenses “like can launchers.” Therefore, Ukraine must destroy Russian combat aircraft directly where they are stationed or when they approach Ukraine. Stupak said that would be a „great advantage and opportunity to stop the Russian advance,” unlike the elaborate attacks on the Crimean bridge.

The latter, Stupak sees, are primarily PR campaigns “for Facebook”: “There will then be likes, memes and reposts for two days,” “But what will it bring us and how will it affect the situation at the front?” Decisive. (SMU)

Continue Reading

Trending