Update from April 24 at 10:07 p.m.: Ukraine stops issuing passports to men aged 18 to 60 who live abroad. Sending passports to Ukrainian diplomatic missions abroad “will no longer be practiced,” a regulation published on the government’s official online portal said on Wednesday. This means that Ukrainian men of military age will only be able to obtain their passports in the country in the future.
The measure is part of the Ukrainian government's efforts to encourage the men to return to their homeland. On Tuesday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Kyiv announced the temporary suspension of consular services for male Ukrainians living abroad who are between 18 and 60 years old, except for the issuance of identity cards for return to Ukraine.
Transparency Notice
The information processed here comes from international media and news agencies, but also from the warring parties in the Ukraine war. Information related to the war in Ukraine cannot be independently verified.
On Wednesday, hundreds of Ukrainians protested in front of the passport issuance office in the Polish capital, Warsaw, because their documents were not delivered to them. Officials justified the stoppage with “technical problems.” Ukraine's ambassador to Poland, Vasyl Swarych, confirmed to AFP that all requests for travel documents submitted before April 23 will be processed.
Zelensky thanks for US aid package
Update from April 24 at 8:40 p.m.: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky thanks the United States after the signed aid package and declares that Ukraine will make every effort in the war to make up for the six months that have passed in discussions and doubts. Zelensky added that the country „must turn against it what the Russian occupier has achieved during this time and what Putin is planning now.”
The Ukrainian president said that the package includes weapons that Ukraine needs to defend itself against Russia, from “ATACMS systems, artillery, anti-tank weapons and HIMARS munitions to the necessary air defense systems and vehicles.”
Secret delivery of weapons in the Ukraine war? Kyiv is said to have received long-range weapons
Update from April 24, 8:01 p.m.: The US government is said to have secretly delivered long-range missiles to Ukraine last month for the first time in the Ukrainian war. It has been reported that Kiev has already used the weapon twice to attack deep within the Russian border POLITICO Citing information from a US government official.
One US official said the administration wants to include additional long-range ATACMS missiles in a new military aid package approved by US President Joe Biden on Wednesday.
Update from April 24 at 7:31 p.m.: According to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky regarding the situation in the Ukrainian war, Ukrainian intelligence has information indicating that Russia wants to disrupt the upcoming peace summit, which is scheduled to be held in Switzerland next June. During a meeting with representatives of partner countries and international organizations, Zelensky said Russia has plans to „reduce the involvement of states” and ensure „peace does not prevail for long.”
Update from April 24, 6:58 p.m.: After US President Joe Biden on Wednesday signed legislation to launch a $1 billion aid package for the Ukraine war, the US Department of Defense announced it would send “significant new security assistance” to Ukraine. According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, among other things, the United States wants to send additional air defense interceptors, artillery shells, armored vehicles and anti-tank weapons for defense. The US State Department estimates the value of the US package at about one billion US dollars.
An exchange takes place in the Ukraine war: Moscow and Kiev reach an agreement
Updated from April 24, 6:20 p.m.: During the Ukraine War, Russia and Ukraine agreed to exchange 48 children displaced as a result of the invasion of Moscow. Russian child rights representative Maria Lowa-Belois announced in Doha that as a result of the agreement, 29 children will be brought to Ukraine and 19 children to Russia. “For the first time, we spoke face to face with the Ukrainian side,” Lvova-Belova added. The agreement was reached through Qatari mediation.
Biden Give A multi-billion dollar aid package Shipping to Ukraine
Update from April 24, 5:55 p.m.: On Wednesday, US President Joe Biden signed a law releasing a billion-dollar aid package for Ukraine. Biden wants to „make sure that deliveries begin immediately, within the next few hours.” Ukrainian aid, worth the equivalent of 57 billion euros, has been blocked by Republicans in the US Congress for several months.
Heavy casualties in the Ukrainian war: the city of Chasiv Yar becomes an intense theater of war
The first report: Chasev Yar – After the capture of Avdiivka by the Russian army, a new and intense theater of war broke out in the city of Chasev Yar. Although the Ukrainian soldiers lack military equipment, they have so far been able to control the city. Now the announced delivery from the USA is expected to take place in this way Kyiv Post mentioned.
“We see that our brave soldiers, including those of the Rubezh Brigade, are repelling the enemy attack even without American assistance,” said Dmytro Kogopenko, Rubezh Brigade officer. Freedom Radio Steadily. In his opinion, if arms shipments arrive from the United States, Russia will not stand a chance.
Defensive fighting around Shasif yar
However, the officer's optimistic mood is not reflected in reports from front-line soldiers. Particularly devastating are the Russian military's so-called „meat attacks” – a maneuver in which waves of infantry are sent into enemy territory in rapid succession. Vladimir Putin's forces are about to take a break. How long this will last is unclear. “They do not stop,” Kochubenko said. “The enemy is constantly destroying our positions with aircraft and artillery.”
Also affecting the forces is the extensive use of aerial bombs, drones and slip bombs. Ukraine is having difficulty repelling them because it lacks air defense. “Two months ago, I could have driven my car into the city, parked it and walked around,” Mykola Mohilevsky, a volunteer in the Ukraine war, told The New York Times. Wall Street Journal. “Now you have to be quick. There is a big risk that the drones will destroy the car.”
Schulz To deliver weapons to Ukraine
The lack of weapons shipments is noticeable not only in direct combat on the front. How is that Wall Street Journal She stated that rescuing the wounded without cover is also more dangerous. Last Thursday (April 18), Chancellor Olaf Scholz urged more deliveries due to Ukraine's needs. high dpa Schultz sees no reason why NATO countries would not comply with Kiev's request to acquire Patriot air defense systems.
In order to consolidate further support, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also called an emergency meeting on Friday (April 19). After the meeting, NATO promised Ukraine to deliver several air defense systems – but the exact deadline for delivery is still pending. “We in Ukraine appreciate the efforts of every leader, every country that is really active, keeping its promises and trying to improve our air defense capabilities,” Zelensky said after the announcement. (Nilhin)
NATO is one a report According to the New York Times (NYT), it appears close to sending troops to Ukraine. These forces aim to train Ukrainian soldiers. According to the American newspaper, this step would drag the United States and Europe deeper into the conflict.
There is a shortage of soldiers in the Ukrainian army, and there appears to be no end in sight to the war. Russia invades the lands. The question is how long Ukraine can survive in the face of a union with about 3.5 times the population.
That’s why Ukrainian officials have reportedly asked the United States and NATO members to bring 150,000 new recruits to the front line to make them operational more quickly — and some Ukrainian forces are now scheduled to be trained in Germany, among other places.
Good morning, Berlin the news
Thank you for registering. You will receive a confirmation via email.
The White House had previously repeatedly confirmed that it would not deploy American forces, including trainers, on Ukrainian territory. This is a position that was repeated by a government official on Thursday. The newspaper wrote that in this case, America could be drawn into a deeper war.
America is against sending troops: but for how long?
The US government called on NATO allies not to send their forces. As part of NATO, the United States would be bound by NATO treaty to help defend against any attack on the trainers.
The New York Times wrote that the United States has not yet agreed to this. However, Gen. Charles Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, claimed on Thursday that NATO’s deployment of trainers seemed inevitable. “We will get there with time,” he added.
The idea of sending troops to Ukraine has been around for a long time. In Europe, French President Emmanuel Macron in particular has called for Europe to be more directly involved in the war in Ukraine. Just this week, the Estonian government also did not rule out sending troops to western Ukraine.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky: Is NATO now sending troops?Bestemage/Imago
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis supported Emmanuel Macron’s position in one of the positions interview With the Guardian last week. “Our forces have already received training before the war in Ukraine,” he said, adding: “So it may be possible to return to this tradition.”
US forces have already trained Ukrainian forces in Poland, Germany and the United States. The United States had previously supported a NATO training program at Gavoriv in western Ukraine, but American forces withdrew from there early in the war.
“US officials now realize that current training by Ukrainian forces is inadequate, and that they need better and faster training to confront the expected Russian attack this summer,” the New York Times wrote.
Training courses abroad were not always successful, the Times wrote, citing as an example training on German soil in maneuver warfare, mine-clearing and other military tasks. However, it is said that such extensive training was rather difficult over a period of twelve weeks.
Ukrainian forces are scheduled to be trained in Germany
Now, large groups of new Ukrainian recruits could be sent to Germany and Poland for training purposes, the New York Times wrote, citing anonymous officials. Accordingly, the troops should be sent to the US Army training facilities in Grafenwoehr (Bavaria). There they will be taught „combined arms warfare.”
The troops will then be sent approximately 1,600 kilometers to Lviv and then to Kiev to reach the front lines. She added that Germany, Britain and France are currently working to locate defense companies in Ukraine to help build and repair weapons systems near the combat zone.
HIt doesn’t look good in war when a country’s defense minister gives his prime minister an ultimatum. “I call on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to make a decision,” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Galant said in a press conference on Wednesday.
He added that Netanyahu must “announce that Israel will not take civilian control of the Gaza Strip, that Israel will not establish a military government in the Gaza Strip, and that an alternative administration to the Hamas administration in the Gaza Strip will be formed immediately.” Gallant, Netanyahu belongs to the Likud Party.
Galant said that „the day after Hamas” can only be achieved if Palestinian bodies take control of Gaza, accompanied by international actors, in reference to the Palestinian Authority and moderate Arab countries.
Read also
According to the Minister of Defense, he has been urging the Prime Minister for months to present a scenario for the period after the military operation in Gaza. But because of his hesitation, Israel’s military successes are once again at stake: „Hesitation in making a decision ultimately means making a decision.”
Six months after the mass killing of Israelis by the Hamas terrorist militia and the start of the subsequent Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip, the tone between the country’s military leadership and Netanyahu’s government has become noticeably harsher. Gallant’s ultimatum was the strongest expression yet of growing opposition among the generals to the lack of leadership in the Jewish state’s political leadership.
Last weekend, the military leadership had already played a grudge against Netanyahu to the media — with the same tenor: If the prime minister does not soon present a plausible scenario for Israel’s war goals, what Israel has achieved so far risks being destroyed. Lost.
Evidence of the officers’ fears can be found in daily reports from the front. Although Israel announced months ago that it had militarily taken control of the northern Gaza Strip, new clashes with Hamas are still erupting there.
Is it perhaps because a reporter asked military spokesman Daniel Hagari earlier this week that Israel has not created a post-war order in the north? Hajari responded: There is no doubt that the presence of an alternative administration to the Hamas administration would increase the pressure on Hamas. But this is a question directed to the political leadership.”
In fact, the solution Gallant outlined in his press conference has been around since at least November of last year. At the time, American, Arab and European representatives, as well as members of Israeli security circles, told WELT AM SONNTAG that the Palestinian Authority would take over the administration of the Gaza Strip and an international protection force with the participation of Western-oriented forces. The Arab countries were in the process of preparation.
But Netanyahu still does not want to make any commitment. The Prime Minister continues to say what he does not want. Shortly after Gallant’s press conference, Netanyahu was released Video about SMS service. Netanyahu says, looking annoyed: “I am not ready to replace Fatehistan with Hamastan.”
He refers to the secular Palestinian organization Fatah, the leading force in the Palestinian Authority, which lost power in Gaza to Hamas, but still bears responsibilities in the West Bank.
The body was established when Israel concluded the Oslo Peace Accords with Fatah leader Yasser Arafat in the early 1990s. Since then, she has been considered the legitimate representative of the Palestinians. “The Palestinian Authority supports terrorism, teaches terrorism, and finances terrorism,” Netanyahu responds to Gallant in the video, even though the Authority generally cooperates with Israel on security issues.
“The basic condition for handing over Gaza to another actor is the destruction of Hamas, without condition or condition.” This is how Netanyahu’s video ends after only 48 seconds, without the Prime Minister explaining who the „other perpetrator” is.
Read also
The fact that Netanyahu avoided making a decision is down to his coalition partners. The majority of his government is very narrow and the Prime Minister relies on the parties of the settler movement and its leaders Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir.
But they are increasingly openly calling for Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip and the alleged voluntary migration of Palestinians from there. Ben Gvir, who holds the position of Minister of Public Security, confirmed this on Wednesday evening. “Tell them: Go home, go to your countries! This is ours now and forever!”
But neither Israel’s allies nor the Israeli people, for whom opinion polls show a clear majority against the reoccupation of the Gaza Strip, support such a plan. The Israeli army had tried unsuccessfully to control the coastal strip for decades until its withdrawal in 2005. The army would not want to undertake such a bloody mission again.
Russia and China demand a buffer zone for nuclear powers
| Reading time: 3 minutes
Vladimir Putin has once again chosen Beijing as his first foreign trip during his new term. Xi Jinping supports the Russian president. In a statement, Beijing and Moscow called for the establishment of some kind of sphere of influence for nuclear powers.
DrThis plan is likely to be aimed primarily at Ukraine’s accession to NATO: Russia and China spoke in a joint declaration in favor of creating a buffer zone for nuclear powers compared to other military alliances.
“Nuclear powers must maintain global strategic stability, respect the principle of equal and indivisible security, and not infringe on each other’s vital interests,” said the joint statement issued by Kremlin President Vladimir Putin and Chinese state and party leader Xi Jinping on Thursday. In particular, “the expansion of military alliances and coalitions and the creation of direct military bridgeheads on the borders of other nuclear powers” should be avoided.
Russia also justified the war in Ukraine by NATO’s expansion eastward, and said it felt threatened. The buffer zone would in effect resemble a Russian sphere of influence, because Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO under this condition. Other former Soviet republics such as Georgia would also be affected by such a buffer zone.
Moscow and Beijing said on Wednesday that the political agreement was an option to resolve the conflict. “Both sides see that a political agreement is the right path to resolving the Ukrainian crisis,” Chinese state and party leader Xi Jinping said Thursday in Beijing during Russian President Putin’s state visit.
China and Russia object to US support for Taiwan
China, a nuclear power, also has a self-interest in securing its influence through a buffer zone. Beijing wants to reunite the island of Taiwan with the mainland, using military means if necessary. It also claims the Taiwan Strait, an international body of water, as its own.
Read also
The two countries also accused the United States of transferring medium-range missiles to Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. “It is about the United States of America creating a global air defense system and deploying its elements in different parts of the world, in the Universe, as well as expanding the potential of high-precision non-nuclear weapons in Europe and the southern part of the Pacific Ocean,” the statement said.
Putin arrived in China on Thursday for a two-day visit. At the beginning of the talks on Thursday, Xi congratulated his „old friend” on his fifth term in office and expressed confidence that Russia’s development would make „great progress” under his leadership.
Xi described the relations as conducive to peace. Sino-Russian relations have become stronger and have withstood “the test of the changing international landscape.” The two sides signed an agreement aimed at deepening the existing partnership between the two countries.
Putin, who began another term in office at the beginning of May, traveled with a delegation of senior politicians and business leaders. These include Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, new Defense Minister Andrei Belousov and Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina. Putin is also accompanied by the heads of some of Russia’s most important companies, such as Igor Sechin of the oil company Rosneft, German Gref of Sberbank, and industrialist Oleg Deripaska. Prime Minister Li Qiang was among the Chinese hosts.